https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/a0c2beef2e2e158882910f15ac02e42b.pdf fdf676a7a6d38f44c91d101370fddda5 PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes February 17, 2022 The regular meeting was called to order at 7:08 PM by Acting Chairperson Kersten Harries. Present: Kersten Harries, Acting Chairperson Erin Carney Matthew Brennan Edward McCarthy Also Present: Joshua Subin, Village Attorney James Natarelli, Village Engineer David Smith, Village Planner Anthony Catalano, Consulting Engineer Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Absent: Marjorie Hsu, Chairperson Lindsay Krakauer Agenda: 1) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III, Preliminary Subdivision and Roads & Infrastructure, Proposed concrete processing operations, Amended site plan approval- Resolution 2) LL Parcel E, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, 102 Legend Drive, Utility enclosure, Amended site plan approval- Resolution 3) Francesco Alesci, 135 Beekman Avenue, Proposed multi-family building, Site plan approval- Continued public hearing 4) Cristian Carrion, 72 Beekman Avenue, Proposed addition and alterations- Site plan approval- Public hearing 5) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block O/P Townhomes, Phase II, Preliminary subdivision plat and site plan approvalPublic hearing 6) Hudson Pines, LLC, 180 Bedford Road, Proposed recreation complex, Site plan approval- Public hearing 7) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block-H, Architectural review and amended site plan approval- Presentation 8) Sleepy Hollow Residences, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, 2 Maxwell Drive, Architectural review approval-signage 9) Approval of minutes, December 16, 2021, January 20, 2022 Chairperson Harries listed the members present and stated that there is a quorum. Chairperson Harries read the agenda. 1 (2/17/22) �1. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase III, Preliminary Subdivision, Roads & Infrastructure, Proposed concrete processing operations, Amended site plan approval- Resolution Chairperson Harries stated that the Board has a draft confirmatory resolution that was verbally approved at the January 20, 2022 meeting. Motion was made to approve the confirmatory resolution. Moved: Harries Seconded: McCarthy Kersten Harries - yes Ed McCarthy - yes Matthew Brennan - yes Erin Carney- yes Vote 4-0 APPROVED 2. LL Parcel, E, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, 102 Legend Drive, Utility enclosure, Amended site plan approval-Preliminary presentation Chairperson Harries stated that the Board has a draft confirmatory resolution that was verbally approved at the January 20, 2022 meeting. Motion was made to approve the confirmatory resolution. Moved: Harries Seconded: Carney Kersten Harries, Acting Chairperson - yes Ed McCarthy - yes Matthew Brennan - yes Erin Carney- yes Vote 4-0 APPROVED 3. Franceso Alesci, 135 Beekman Avenue, Proposed multi-family building, Site plan approval-Continued public hearing Chairperson Harries stated that the applicant has requested an adjournment to the March 17, 2022 meeting but the Board will open the public hearing for comments. Motion was made to reopen the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: McCarthy Vote 4-0 Chairperson Harries stated that the Board has received written comments from Anne White that will be included in the minutes and posted on the Village website. ( See Exhibit #1) Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the public. There were no other comments from the public. 2 (2/17/22) �Motion was made to adjourn the public hearing to the March 17, 2022 meeting. Moved: Harries Seconded: McCarthy Vote 4-0 4. Cristian Carrion, 72 Beekman Avenue, Proposed addition and alterations, Site plan approval-Preliminary-Public hearing Motion was made to open the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: Brennan Vote 4-0 Michael Tribe is the architect representing the applicant. Mr. Tribe stated that the proposed application is an as of right renovation and partial reconstruction of a building with no proposed change in use. Mr. Tribe stated that the changes made to the proposed project drawings include the addition of cornices, window trim, changing the covering of the brick piers from clad to stucco, and removing the decorative light fixtures and replacing them with downlights. Mr. Tribe stated that two elevation options were provided to the Board for review that include a flat surface option or a bay bump out for the exterior fa9ade. Mr. Tribe presented two renderings to show the proposed front elevation options and changes made to the project. Chairperson Harries stated that the purpose of suggesting the addition of the bay bump out was so that it would look similar to the adjacent building and have windows on the different faces of the bay that would allow light to enter a room at different times of the day. The rendering provided shows two windows on the front of the bay and two solid walls on the sides which defeats the purpose of the bump out. Ms. Harries stated that the trim around the windows doesn't appear to address the concerns expressed by Sean McCarthy in regards to the trim material for areas with the vertical siding verses the stucco and the use of a wood casing trim. Mr. Tribe stated that he agreed with the suggestion and that the wood casing trim has been added to the windows in the areas with siding. Chairperson Harries questioned why the decorative light fixtures were eliminated and switched to downlights. Mr. Tribe stated that his client is desperate to start construction so he was advised to switch the lighting to down lights. Chairperson Harries stated that although she appreciates the effort made to address the suggestions made by the Board for the elevations, there are some items on the plans that haven't been addressed since the last meeting. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Tribe if the windows on the adjacent home will be blocked by the construction of the new vertical wall being built right up to the lot line. Mr. Tribe stated that they have a right to build right up to the property line and that they are going to create a space so the neighboring windows will have a shaft of light. 3 (2/17/22) �Chairperson Harries stated that the space is not indicated on the plans. Mr. Tribe presented the proposed floor plan and the existing site plan and stated that they will work with the structure of the proposed exterior wall to step in 12 inches to allow for space between the windows of the adjacent building. Sean McCarthy stated that the current plan does not indicate that the wall is stepping in 12 inches at the windows and requested that Mr. Tribe revise the plans. Chairperson Harries questioned how the basement level is accessed. Mr. Tribe described how the basement level is accessed from the first floor and stated that the door was mistakenly not drawn on the plans. Chairperson Harries questioned if the applicant has considered the suggestion made to provide access to the rear yard as an amenity space for the residents. Mr. Tribe stated that in order to provide access to the rear yard, an additional staircase would have to be added to the building that would increase the footprint and create other issues; or have an agreement with the first floor retail space to allow the residents to access the backyard. Chairperson Harries questioned what will be in the basement. Mr. Tribe stated that the basement will be used purely as a mechanical room. Erin Carney questioned how the garbage and recycling will be handled and where will the garbage containers be stored. Mr. Tribe stated that each of the tenants will be responsible for taking their garbage to the curb on collection day and that they will need to plan for an area to store the garbage containers for the building. Chairperson Harries stated the since the proposed project is on Beekman Avenue there will be impacts to the public and the Village during the construction process. The Planning Board requires a Construction Logistics Plan to make sure that sidewalk and street closures, and related construction issues will be addressed correctly. Mr. Tribe stated that they will submit a set of scaffolding drawings to the Building Department during site operation. Mr. Tribe stated that he can't submit a construction logistics plan and that they typically ask the contractor to hire an engineer to complete those plans and to submit the Building Department. Sean McCarthy stated that the Planning Board isn't requesting details of the scaffolding; they need to see a plan detailing how the building will be constructed within the Village right-of-way and if items related to street parking, dumpsters, or a sidewalk bridge will be need to be coordinated. 4 (2/17/22) �Mr. Tribe stated that the contractor completes the construction logistic plan and that he, as the architect, is not putting that on his drawings because it holds him liable. Sean McCarthy stated that the owner is a contractor and the site plan application approval will not move forward until the information requested by the Planning Board is provided. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from James Natarelli in regards to the engineering review. James Natarelli asked Mr. Tribe if there are updates regarding the stormwater system design. Mr. Tribe stated that as per the letter prepared by TW Engineering, P.C., it is his understanding that because they are reducing the impervious surface there is not a code that tells them that they have to do anything further. Mr. Tribe stated that if the Board is requesting something that is outside of the code requirement, they would need to know exactly what they are asking for. James Natarelli stated that he has explained to Mr. Wojciekofsky that it is the policy of the Planning Board and the Building Department for site plan applications to consider stormwater mitigation and design the system based on the 100 year storm event. Mr. Tribe requested guidance on what needs to be presented. James Natarelli stated that they need to investigate and show the data on how the run-off from impervious surfaces can be handled and contained on the site as it relates to the assumptions made on soil infiltration, and the increased runoff that may be created by the changes in the roof pitch. Sean McCarthy asked Mr. Tribe where the existing storm water is discharging. Mr. Tribe stated that all of the existing storm water is going to the street from underground. Mr. McCarthy stated that there is not a storm sewer system connection on the south side of the street so if the run-off is going into the sanitary sewer system, it is illegal, and will have to be disconnected and be addressed on site. James Natarelli suggested that they submit the historic data they have regarding infiltration rates for him to review and consider. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the public. There were no comments from the public. Chairperson Harries solicited additional comments from the Board and consultants. Sean McCarthy questioned how far the proposed bay bump out will be and if they will extend over the property line. 5 (2/17/22) �Mr. Tribe stated that the proposed bay bump out will be 18 inches and will extend over the property line. Mr. McCarthy stated that the current drawings indicate 4 inches and will need to be revised for the Boards review. Mr. Tribe solicited comments on which elevation the Board prefers. Mr. McCarthy stated that unless the windows can be angled on the bay bump outs, it should be a box bay. Motion was made to adjourn the public hearing to the March 17, 2022 meeting. Moved: Harries Seconded: Brennan Vote 4-0 5. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block O/P & N Townhomes, Phase II, Preliminary subdivision plat and site plan-Public hearing Motion was made to open the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: McCarthy Vote 4-0 Andrew Tung is an associate of DTS Provident Design Engineering, LLP representing the applicant. Mr. Tung presented an illustrative site plan and stated that they are proposing to add Block-N to the Block O/P site plan. Block-N is located at the north east corner of Legend Drive where it is proposed to construct a clubhouse for the residents of Block O/P two, a lap pool, outdoor space, and an additional area consisting of 44 on-grade parking spaces. Mr. Tung stated that changes were made to the proposed site plan where interior roadways, and units where shifted to address the site circulation and open space concerns of the Board and the consultants. There will be 90 townhome units in Block O/P combined with the approved 20 units for a total of 110 units. The proposed widths of the townhome units range from 20 feet to 28 feet and have been designed to provide architectural variety within each group. The required 330 parking spaces were calculated at 3 spaces per 4 bedroom unit. The plan proposes to supply 402 parking spaces within the complex. There will be 2 parking spaces provided in each garage; 51 of the units will include a driveway where 2 additional parking spaces will be provided. The 39 units proposed to face Legend Drive and Hollows Pass will have aprons in lieu of the full driveway. There will also be 77 additional parking spaces along the frontage of Hollows Pass, Palisades Boulevard, and Legend Drive. Mr. Tung stated that the applicant has selected Sun Homes as the designated builder. Mr. Tung described the Sun Homes firm and examples of the developments they have designed. Mr. Tung presented the proposed renderings and elevations for the first group of townhomes units in the northeast corner of the site. Mr. Tung described the "Kit of Parts" options that will be available for the homeowners to select. Mr. Tung presented the proposed floor plans and described the design layout for each level of the proposed 20 and 22 foot wide units. Mr. Tung presented the proposed subdivision map and stated that 25 separate tax parcel lots are proposed for each of the groups of buildings and the 2 open spaces. Each group of parcels will allow for both pedestrian and vehicular access throughout the block. Each townhome buyer will be a part of the Block O/P Townhome Two Homeowners Association and the overall 6 (2/17/22) �Edge-on-Hudson Homeowners Association. Mr. Tung stated that Sun Homes is prepared to return to the Planning Board for Architectural Review approval for each set of townhomes. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from Anthony Catalano in regards to the engineering drawings. Anthony Catalano stated that the stormwater reports and drawings need to be updated to address the comments from their review memos. Chairperson Harries asked Andrew Tung to describe how the proposed open space is consistent with the original Riverfront Design Concept Plan ("RDCP"). Mr. Tung stated that the original 2007 approvals of the RDCP, the Design Guidelines, the Special Permit and the Environmental Findings were designed as a framework for the parameters for the the total number of units and open spaces to be provided for the Village within the site. The approvals allowed for moving of the units, roadways and open spaces within each block. The designs for each block have changed over time to provide better circulation within the blocks and the open spaces, based on the interior roadways. Mark Weingarten is partner with DelBello Donnellan Weingarten Wise & Wiederkhr, LLP representing the applicant. Mr. Weingarten stated that that there are legal requirements that the Planning Board are compelled to follow and areas where they have jurisdiction for discretion. The proposed plan complies materially with the RDCP. The Board has jurisdiction to approve the changes as they relate to the parking and they are open to requesting that the Village Board document their approval in a resolution. Chairperson Harries requested that Mr. Tung provide more details on the proposed Block N and how it relates to open spaces and the Kingsland Point Park buffer. Peter Chavkin is a Managing Partner of Biddle Real Estate Ventures on behalf of Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC and stated that the grading of the Kingsland Point Buffer area has been changed since the RDCP to accommodate the potential flooding of the Pocantico River coming across the railroad tracks. They are working with the Sleepy Hollow Local Development Corporation on FEMA related issues with the East Parcel to determine what the grading contour needs to be. When the results for the channel grading contour are determined, they will bring the plans before the Open Space Council and then before the Planning Board with site plan applications for the third length of the Tappan Zee Park, the Kingsland Point Park buffer, and the Palisades Boulevard section of the Waterfront Open Space. Chairperson Harries asked Peter Chavkin what the proposed landscape planting will be in the buffer area. Mr. Chavkin stated that meadow grasses will be proposed in the buffer areas. David Smith stated that as part of the Environmental Review Findings, there was a concern raised that there would be a too much of a wall of buildings that fronted Kingsland Point Park and the buffer, and that the idea of allowing green space to penetrate into the development was 7 (2/17/22) �discussed by several of the Boards and associations, and incorporated into the RDCP. The current plan shows a wall of buildings along the buffer of Kingsland Point Park. The Village Board should be consulted to let them know that there is a change proposed to the RDCP similar to what has been done before with other site plans. Mr. Smith stated it was an important design element because members of the public and Village representatives requested for it to be a part of the RDCP. Jonathan Stein is a Managing Member of Diversified Realty Advisors, LLC and stated that the proposed site plan for Block O/P has improved since the original RDCP and they have increased the connectivity of the proposed development and the open spaces. Mrs. Stein stated that Chairperson Hsu has discussed this plan with the Village Board and there were no objections. Mr. Chavkin stated that green space penetrates into the O/P Block at the linear open space proposed at Sleeper Haven, where there previously was a public street, and that open space was simply relocated to different areas. The layout of the proposed buildings in Block O/P are an improvement from the RDCP as they relate to DPW and fire access. Sarah Smiley is a resident of Sleepy Hollow and a member of Mothers Out Front. Ms. Smiley stated that the proposed plan to use fossil fuel powered heating systems in the buildings will have a lasting impact on the community's carbon footprint. Ms. Smiley provided information related to the environmental impacts that occur from fuel emissions and suggested that the builders consider options using ground source heat pumps or air source heat pumps as alternatives for heating and cooling. Ms. Smiley provided details of future legislation that would ban the use of fossil fuel sources for new construction. Arlene Siegel is a resident living on Bellwood Avenue and stated that she shares the concerns of Sarah Smiley and stated that since these are new buildings, they have the opportunity to customize each development to use renewable fuels and this should be considered during the planning process. Chairperson Harries asked Peter Chavkin to describe what is currently planned for heating and cooling for the buildings. Mr. Chavkin stated that the builder has engaged with a firm called Enduring Energy to study geothermal energy for the proposed townhomes through the NYSERDA Flextech program. The study is being evaluated and they are unable to commit to its use yet. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Chavkin if geothermal is not possible, will the builder consider options for using air sourced heat pumps and solar. Mr. Chavkin stated that he will request that Bill McGuiness of Sun Homes respond to the questions regarding renewable energy sources. Chairperson Harries requested that the applicant resolve open issues and comments related to the civil drawings and stated that the Board will seek approval from the Board of Trustees for the changes as they relate to the RDCP. 8 (2/17/22) �Motion was made to adjourn the public hearing to the March 17, 2022 meeting. Moved: Harries Seconded: McCarthy Vote 4-0 6. Hudson Pines, LLC, 180 Bedford Road, Proposed recreation complex, Site plan approval -Public hearing Motion was made open the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: McCarthy Vote 4-0 Kimberly Martelli is the architect representing the applicant and stated that they are seeking approval for the reconstruction of the existing Carriage House, and an enclosed pool. They have received approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals for the requested variances consistent with previous approvals. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the Board and the consultants. There were no comments from the Board or the consultants. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the public. There were no comments from the public. Motion was made to close the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: Carney Vote 4-0 Motion was made to approve the application and to direct village staff to draft a confirmatory resolution for the March 17, 2022 meeting. Moved: Harries Seconded: Carney Kersten Harries, Acting Chairperson - yes Ed McCarthy - yes Matthew Brennan - yes Erin Carney- yes Vote 4-0 APPROVED 7. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block H, Architectural review and amended site plan approval- Presentation Rick Cook is the founder of Cook Fox Architects representing the applicant and stated that he is there to present the architectural elements of the design of Block-H. Mr. Cook stated that since the site plan was approved, changes have been made to the westward townhouses to comply with the FEMA Preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Map for habitable space so that lowest room elevation is located at +11 feet. Mr. Cook stated that other changes to the site plan include the addition of accessible roof gardens and additional outdoor spaces for the residents. Roof top mechanical equipment will be moved away from the exterior face of the building fa9ade and screened walls will been added to conceal the views of the equipment from the street level. 9 (2/17/22) �Chairperson Harries asked if the mechanical equipment would be concealed by the screened walls even in the higher elevations along Beekman Avenue. Rick Cook stated that they are using taller screened walls so that the equipment will not be seen from higher elevations. Rick Cook presented a rendering of the building at the north east corner of Lighthouse Landing and described the elements of the front entry for the residents. Chairperson Harries questioned if the landscape designs for the north east public plaza area will account for the changes in elevations. Mr. Cook presented the original landscape plan developed by Hart Howerton for the plaza and stated that the proposed landscaping will remain and will accommodate the change in elevation along Westward Drive while keeping the retail elements level. Mr. Cook presented the rendering for the townhouses on Westward Drive. The fifth floors of the buildings are now proposed to be setback from the front fa9ade there will be 3 private roof top elements that will be accessible from the elevator and stairs. Mr. Cook presented the elevations and material illustrations and stated that there will be an increase in the overall building area of approximately 500 square feet; from 306,227 square feet to 306,751 square feet. Mr. Cook stated that the overall parking space count in the garage has decreased from 204 spaces to 201 spaces, and the total unit count has been reduced from 104 to 100. Edward McCarthy asked Mr. Cook how many retail stores are planned for the block and asked where visitors will park. Mr. Cook stated that there are 3 retails spaces proposed for the building. One retail space will be in the plaza across from DeCicco's and two retails spaces will be located along Westward Drive to draw people to the waterfront park. Peter Chavkin stated that as part of the Site Plan approval granted in December, the required parking spaces were split up to have 204 spaces in the Block-H building; 50 of the required parking spaces would be supplied in the Block-F parking garage; and the remaining balance of the 18 required parking spaces would be supplied in the future Block-K garage. The garage for Block-H will be private to the building residents and their guests. There will be publicly accessible parking spaces to support the retail spaces located across Lighthouse Landing in Block-F and Block-K. Chairperson Harries requested that the applicant submit copies of any of the new documents presented at this meeting. Mr. Chavkin stated that part of the Site Plan approval, the applicant was required to supply a landscape plan to resolve the concern of the headlights exiting the parking garage and solutions for screening the view of the utility equipment in the Village Green for the residents of Ichabod's Landing. Mr. Chavkin presented the proposed landscape plan and stated that they propose to add a series of evergreen trees for screening and that they agree to have the Building Inspector 10 (2/17/22) �perform an inspection to confirm that the trees satisfy the concerns when completed. Screened walls are also proposed at the transformer location along Westward Drive. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Chavkin to confirm that they plan to present the proposed signage for ARB approval at a later date. Mr. Chavkin confirmed that they plan on submitting the proposed signage for ARB approval at a later date. Erin Carney suggested that it would be helpful for the applicant to present how connectivity throughout the site and to the river front park will be safely accessible for bicycles. Chairperson Harries stated that although the streets have been approved it would be helpful if directional signs are provided to guide pedestrians and bicyclists through the site. Mr. Chavkin stated that the intention of the Special Permit was to design the roadways to have limited speed limits and to be wide enough to allow for shared vehicular and pedestrian/bicycle traffic; and did not include separate bike lanes. The streets are owned by the Village and the Village Board is responsible for providing details for pedestrian uses and direction. David Smith read the resolve clauses and the conditions of the amended draft resolution. Chairperson Harries stated that the Planning Board waives the requirement for a public hearing due to the minor changes of the approved site plan amendment. Motion was made to approve the resolution for the Amended Site Plan and Architectural Review. Moved: Harries Seconded: McCarthy Kersten Harries, Acting Chairperson - yes Ed McCarthy - yes Matthew Brennan - yes Erin Carney- yes Vote 4-0 APPROVED 8. Sleepy Hollow Residences, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, 2 Maxwell Drive (Block-F), Architectural review- signage Lilly Ackerman is Director of Development for Hines representing the owners and developers for Northlight, formally known as Block-F of the Edge-on-Hudson Development. Ms. Ackerman stated that they are seeking approval for the exterior signage at four building elevations. Ms. Ackerman presented the proposed sign location map for two secondary signage locations and one parking identification sign. Ms. Ackerman presented illustrations and described the location, size, and materials for the proposed primary canopy building entrance identification sign. Sophie Nitkin is an associate for Hines representing the owner and developers for Northlight. Ms. Nitkin presented illustrations and described the locations, size and materials for the proposed 11 (2/17/22) �secondary canopy signage at two secondary entrances to building and stated that the signage proposed is a smaller scale than the primary entrance sign and will not be illuminated. Ms. Nitkin presented the proposed parking signage for the garage entrance and stated that it will be apparent to both pedestrian and vehicular traffic, will be visible from both directions, and be illuminated at night. Ms. Nitkin described the proposed location, size and material for the sign proposed to indicate the parking area. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the Board members and consultants. There were no questions received from the Board or the consultants. Chairperson Harries stated that due to the minor modifications presented, the public hearing has been waived and a draft resolution has been prepared for the proposed signage plan. Motion was made to approve the resolution for the Amended Site Plan and architectural review for the proposed signage. Moved: Harries Seconded: McCarthy Kersten Harries, Acting Chairperson - yes Ed McCarthy - yes Matthew Brennan - yes Erin Carney- yes Vote 4-0 APPROVED 9. Approval of minutes- December 16, 2021, January 20, 2022 Motion was made to approve the December 16, 2021 minutes. Moved: Harries Seconded: Carney Kersten Harries, Acting Chairperson - yes Ed McCarthy - yes Matthew Brennan - yes Erin Carney- yes Vote 4-0 APPROVED Motion was made to table the January 20, 2022 minutes to the March 17, 2022 minutes. Motion was made to adjourn the meeting at 9:20 PM. Moved: Harries Seconded: Carney Vote 4-0 12 (2/17/22) Respectfully submitted, PoJVLZ&V / y t Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board �Exhibit #1 RECEIVED FEB 1 7 2022 BUILDING DEPT. r A ...u 4. u-4. u ^ -i VILLAGE OF SLEEPY HOLLOW From: Anne White <awhitepho@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2022 2:27 PM To: Sean McCarthy <smccarthy@sleepyhollowny.org>; Marjorie Hsu <hsubuck@verizon.net>; Kersten Harries <info@kerstenharries.com>; Erin Carney <camey.erin@gmail.com> Subject: 135 Beekman comment for Public Hearing 2-17-2022 Please circulate this comment to the Planning Board members in advance of tonight's Public Hearing on 135 Beekman Street. And please also post it online. To the members of the Planning Board: Thank you for extending the Public Hearing to allow for more people to express their concerns and/or support for aspects of the 135 Beekman proposal. I have commented a number of times on my concern that the proposed building does not meet the height requirements of the Lower Beekman overlay zone and design standards, but must now set that aside in light of the ruling that has been given on this issue. What I have not done publicly to date is to thank the Planning Board and Building Department for the improvements that have been made in the site plan as a result of your comments and suggestions. I speak especially to the Beekman Avenue facade and the mansard roof, which will help the building fit better into the historic lower Beekman streetscape. Now I would like to see if it's possible for the Planning Board to address an additional issue that concerns me — the loss of several moderately priced housing units when the existing house is torn down. It's my understanding that there are currently three apartments in that building with rents below market rate. At one session of the public hearing, someone asked the developer if he would be willing to commit to include three "affordable" units in the new building to replace those |ost to demolition. And he responded Yes, he would be ,ivilling to do that. So I'm wondering if the Planning Board might raise the question with him again to see if he's still willing to do that, as a way of helping the Village address the urgent need for more affordable housing. And if he agrees, could the Planning Board make this a provision of site plan approval? ideally at 60-80% of Westchester AMI? What he might lose in rent would surely be repaid with good will. I will not be attending the Planning Board meeting this evening, but hope someone from the Planning Board or Building Department might raise the question with the developer. Thanks to all the Planning Board members for your willingness to spend so many hours on working to make new development happen, and ensuring that the resulting buildings enhance the livability and visual qualities that make our village so special. Anne White 3301 Kendal Way 1 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2022 Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2022-02-17_Approved Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2022 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2022 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text