https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/91231cdc6175c22929b6dced6ddee88f.pdf de64ae478f7248dbeb29a9d4e4180760 PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes March 23, 2023 The regular meeting was called to order at 7:05 PM by Acting Chairperson Harries. Acting Chairperson Harries summarized the agenda. Present: Kersten Harries, Acting Chairperson Erin Carney Benjamin Nielsen Benjamin Sirota Rachelle Gebler Also Present: Joshua Subin, Village Attorney Anthony Catalano, Consulting Engineer James Natarelli, Village Engineer Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Absent: Lindsay Krakauer David Smith, Village Planner Agenda: 1) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block H, Amended Site Plan and Final ARB Approval- Presentation 2) Hudson Pines, LLC, 180 Bedford Road, Amended Site Plan approval - Draft resolution 3) 46 Hudson St., LLC, 46 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan approval- Public hearing 4) Francesco Alesci, 135 Beekman Avenue, Proposed multi-family building, Architectural Review Approval- Presentation 5) Gabe Realty Corp., 305 North Washington Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan approval- Presentation 6) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit approvalPresentation 7) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block O/P & N Townhomes Phase II, Architectural Review approval - Presentation 8) Approval of minutes, February 16, 2023 1. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Block H, Amended Site Plan & Final ARB approval - Draft resolution 1 (3/23/23) �Elizabeth Darby is the Vice President of Construction for Hines representing the applicant. Ms. Darby presented a rendering of the proposed mechanical screening along Westwood Drive and solicited comments from the Board. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Ms. Darby to confirm the color of the proposed mechanical screening. Ms. Darby stated that the color of the mechanical screening would be a custom charcoal grey color that will match the railings. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Ms. Darby if the other exterior materials will remain as originally proposed. Ms. Darby stated that there are no other material changes. Acting Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the Board. There were no comments from the Board. Acting Chairperson Harries made a motion to waive the public hearing and to direct staff to draft a resolution for the April 20, 2023 meeting. Moved: Harries Seconded: Gebler Acting Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Erin Carney- yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Benjamin Sirota - yes Vote 5-0 APPROVED 2. Hudson Pines, LLC, 180 Bedford Road, Amended Site Plan approval - Draft resolution Kimberly Martelli stated that she is the Principle of KTM Architects and the architect representing the applicant. Ms. Martelli presented the landscape plan and stated that they proposed to plant Rhododendrons along Bedford Road and the gravel access path. There a (9) Traditional American Holly trees proposed to surround the generators and (5) Shade-Grown Hollies along the outer edges of the road. At the time of planting the Hollies, the trees will be 12 to 14 feet high and will be above height of the generators. They will use the gravel access road to service the propane tanks and the generators. Ms. Martelli presented photographs and a video to demonstrate the views from Bedford Road passing by the proposed generator locations, and stated that the applicant has finalized the color for the generator surrounds as stone grey. Ms. Martelli stated that they received the stormwater drainage questions. James Natarelli stated that all of the stormwater and sanitary sewer issues have been resolved with the latest submission. 2 (3/23/23) �Benjamin Nielsen asked Ms. Martelli what the site would look like when there is no leaf coverage. Ms. Martelli showed the Planning Board recent photographs of the site and stated that the generator locations are marked out on the site, and that even during the winter, there is a lush landscape buffer. Acting Chairperson Harries requested that Ms. Martelli stake out the corners of the generator heights so that the Board could schedule a site visit to see the visibility from Bedford Road. Benjamin Sirota asked Ms. Martelli for the height of the generator boxes. Ms. Martelli stated that the generator boxes are eight feet high and require sound attenuation jackets to satisfy the Village decibel requirements. Ms. Martelli stated that the existing transformer is well screened from Bedford Road. Mr. Nielsen asked if the original application proposed to construct a full enclosure structure for the generators. Ms. Martelli stated that they eliminated the bunker structures because it was cost effective by reducing the amount of disturbance needed for installing the generators, and the sound attenuation jackets will serve the purpose for decibel requirements. Mr. Nielsen asked Ms. Martelli why the retaining walls do not curve around the three sides of the generators. Ms. Martelli stated that building another retaining wall would require a variance and due to the grade, it would not provide benefits of screening or sound attenuation. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Ms. Martelli to explain why the elimination of the generator bunker structure would cause less disturbance on site. Ms. Martelli stated that less trees would need to be removed there will be less impervious surface. Ms. Martelli presented the site plan and described the proposed storm water system. Mr. Nielsen asked Ms. Martelli if they proposed to cover the propane tanks. Ms. Martelli stated that there will be full grass coverage over the propane tanks and that the green filling caps will be the only item exposed at 6 inches above grade. Acting Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the Board. There were no further comments from the Board. Acting Chairperson Harries adjourned the application until the April 20, 2023 meeting pending a site visit. No action was taken. 3 (3/23/23) �3. 46 Hudson St., LLC, 46 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan approval - Public hearing Alex Tseng is the owner of 46 Hudson Street and stated that he received approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Tseng stated that the revised application proposes to increase the setback from 48 Hudson Street from 2.7 feet to 3 feet. The required number of parking spaces has been reduced from (7) to (6) by removing one of the bedrooms from the third floor. The application proposes to supply (3) parking stalls and the variance was granted for (3) parking stalls. Acting Chairsperson Harries asked Mr. Tseng to provide a summary of the application and the proposed changes since the last presentation. Mr. Tseng stated that the application proposes to construct a three-family building that will maintain the same massing as the existing two-family building. The proposed building is slightly smaller and will provide (3) onsite parking stalls at the back of the property. Mr. Tseng presented the site plan and stated that the proposed building shifts to the North side of the property in order to allow for the installation of windows and to provide natural light into the apartments. Acting Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the Board. Benjamin Nielsen asked Mr. Tseng if there were other driving factors for the site plan layout on the north side of the property. Mr. Tseng stated that the additional lighting was the reason for shifting the building layout to the north side of the property. Motion was made to open the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: Nielsen Vote 5-0 Acting Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the public. Clara Tiegel is the owner of 38 Hudson Street stated that she grew up with the owners of 48 Hudson Street. Ms. Tiegel stated that the applicant originally proposed a 2.7 feet side yard setback from 48 Hudson and then changed it to propose a 3-foot setback. Ms. Tiegel stated that required setback is 5 feet. Ms. Tiegel stated that the Board should require a minimum of 3 feet, 10 inches to allow for safe repairs to the 48 and 46 Hudson Street buildings. Ms. Tiegel submitted a letter to the Board (See attached Exhibit #1). William White stated that he grew up at 48 Hudson Street. Mr. White provided a history of the occupancy of 48 Hudson Street. Mr. White stated that shifting the building to the north setback would block three windows on the side of 48 Hudson Street. Mr. White stated that he attended the Zoning Board meeting and stated that it was unacceptable to allow the removal of the usable space between the buildings. Mr. White stated that the value of a house is effected by the space in between neighboring houses. Mr. White requested that the Planning Board review the 5-foot 4 (3/23/23) �setback requirements and the errors in the proposed application. Approval of the application will cause impact to his family and the community. A letter was received from Mr. White (See Exhibit #2). Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Tseng to provide the distances between the 48 Hudson Street and the 46 Hudson Street buildings, at the narrowest point. Mr. Tseng stated that the building at 48 Hudson Street is located approximately 1 foot from the property line and there is 3 feet from the property line to the building at 46 Hudson Street at the narrowest location. Acting Chairperson Harries stated that the application has evolved four times since the first presentation to the Planning Board in June of 2022. Originally, the applicant proposed to utilize the original foundation. The Planning Board had suggested that the applicant set the building back to be similar to the neighboring buildings, and to find a way to provide parking on the site. Relocating the building to the north side allows the applicant to provide a driveway width that permits access to the parking at the rear of the property. Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. Tseng to describe why the parking maneuverability would not work unless they shift the building to the north. Mr. Tseng presented the site plan and stated that because the property line jogs on the south side, it would not allow for easy driveway access at the rear of the property. An easement agreement was negotiated with the attorney’s for 48 Hudson Street so that they have enough space to fit the (3) parking spaces at the rear of the building. Sean McCarthy stated that the 48 Hudson Street building is located one foot from their property line so there will be a total of 4 feet between the proposed 46 Hudson Street building and the existing 48 Hudson Street building. Acting Chairperson Harries suggested that the Board adjourn the public hearing to the next meeting in order to allow the new Planning Board member to review the current application. Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. Tseng if there have been discussions for maintenance access agreements between the property owners. Mr. Tseng stated that the easement agreements include stipulations for access to maintain both of the properties. Motion was made to adjourn the public hearing to the April 20, 2023 Planning Board meeting. Moved: Harries Seconded: Gebler Vote 5-0 4. Francesco Alesci, 135 Beekman Aenue, Proposed multi-family building, Architectural Review approval - Presentation Maximillian Mahalek is the attorney with Cuddy + Feder, LLP representing the applicant. Mr. Mahalek stated that the application received Site Plan approval from the Planning Board in 5 (3/23/23) �January. As per the conditions of the Site Plan approval resolution, the applicant submitted revised site plans and engineering drawings to address the items required for the Building Permit process. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Mahalek if the applicant submitted the landscape plan to the Building Department. Mr. Mahalek stated that the landscape plan is being prepared as part of the condition of the Site Plan approval. James Natarelli requested that the engineer submit the revised civil drawings and the lighting plan to the Building Department for the records. There was a discussion between James Natarelli and the applicants’ representatives as to what what plans are required for review by staff as it relates to the Site Plan and the Architectural Review approval by the Planning Board. Christopher Barbagli is an associate with Vassoltti Architects representing the applicant. Mr. Barbagli presented a revised roof plan to detail the approximate locations of mechanical equipment, screening, and roof fans. Rachelle Gebler asked Mr. Barbagli if there is a rendering of the proposed roof top mechanical screening. Mr. Barbagli presented a street view prospective from the building and stated that the mechanical screening would not be visible from the across the street. Ms. Gebler stated that the residents of the building would see the mechanical screening. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Barbagli if there are updated renderings that show the elevator tower as drawn in the elevations. Mr. Barbagli stated that the elevator tower would not be visible as it is 30 feet back from the street face, and there will be landscaping around it. Acting Chairperson Harries stated that the elevator tower would be a predominant vertical element that will be visible by neighboring properties. Ms. Harries requested to see a rendering updated with the current design and elevations, and that depicts the final colors of the finished materials. Acting Chairperson Harries asked if the street trees included in the renderings are accurate in scale. Mr. Barbagli stated that the renderings are accurate. The tree in the front of the building is existing and the other tree is a neighboring property owner’s tree. They will confirm all of the plantings as part of the final landscape plan. Sal Alesci is one of the applicants. Mr. Alesci presented samples of the proposed Hardie Plank siding and the Fypon materials proposed for trim, railings, and columns. Mr. Alesci also 6 (3/23/23) �provided a sample of the proposed slate roof material and solicited comments from the Board on color selections. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Alesci to describe the shutters and the windows. Mr. Alesci stated that the windows would be black with white trim and black shutters. Benjamin Nielsen suggested providing more architectural elements on the front façade. There was a discussion regarding the front façade and possibilities of providing more architectural elements, how the size of the shutters relate to the window sizes, and the window heights and spacing from the first and second floor. Sean McCarthy suggested that the architects check the balconies on the roof level as the rendering shows them flush and the elevation shows them as extended out. Erin Carney suggested that the applicant determine the programming of the roof top amenity space as it relates to landscaping, water access, and screening from the sun. Mr. Nielsen asked if the applicant is considering solar energy. Frank Alesci stated that they are considering the possibility of roof top solar panels. Sean McCarthy suggested that the applicant could consider making the building solar ready with electrical conductors. Sal Alesci asked if the Board requires a rendering for the roof top amenity space. Ms. Gebler stated that since it is an amenity space that would be visible to neighboring properties, it is important to provide a rendering for the programming of the space and a detail for the mechanical screening. Frank Alesci is the applicant and stated that since they have modified the plans several times, not all the renderings incorporate with the current design. Mr. Alesci requested that the Board provide them with all of their requests with the hopes that they will not have to revise the plans again. Sal Alesci asked the Board if they should enlarge the roof top amenity space and include a pergola. Ms. Carney stated that an option for sun screening would be a good design feature for a roof top amenity space and that they should decide what items would be attractive for the residents to enjoy the space. The application was adjourned to the April 20, 2023 Planning Board meeting No action was taken. 7 (3/23/23) �5. Gabe Realty Corp., 305 North Washington Street, Proposed three-family residence Site Plan approval- Presentation Gregory Caccioppoli is the engineer representing the applicant. Mr. Caccioppoli stated the revised plans address the comments received from the Board related to the front porches, dormer details, and roof and door overhangs. The structure would be a multi-family dwelling with one main water meter and sub meters for each of the units. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that his intention is to get approval to move forward with the building design before updating the mechanical and utility plans. The proposed exterior materials are Hardie Plank siding, white Anderson windows with white PVC trim, and columns wrapped in PVC. Mr. Caccioppoli presented the site plan and stated they propose an unfinished basement space with laundry machines. Each unit will contain two bedrooms and two bathrooms on the second floor. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Caccioppoli if there are windows proposed in the basement, if the attic space is accessible, and if they have determined the sources for utilities. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that there will be windows in the rear of the basement and that the attic space will be accessible storage space for each unit. The applicant proposes to use electrical heat pump units for the heating and cooling systems, and they would utilize the existing gas service for cook tops and other appliances as necessary. Acting Chairperson Harries suggested that the applicant consider all electric for utilities and asked Mr. Caccioppoli if he has sited the locations for the condensers units. Mr. Cacioppoli stated that he has not completed the utilities plan yet. Mr. Caccioppoli summarized the proposed parking layout and stated that it may need adjustments based on the current design. Sean McCarthy asked Mr. Cacioppoli if he provided a basement plan. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that Westchester Modular Homes did not provide a basement plan because the basement is an unfinished space with laundry machines. Mr. McCarthy stated that a basement plan is required to build the foundation, show where the utilities will be located, how to access the basement, and to confirm if there will be one large basement space or three individual areas for each unit. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that he has not finalized the parking layout with how to balance open space with parking back up space, and the property setbacks that will require a variance. Mr. McCarthy suggested that they locate the parking spaces behind the property line and create a landscaped buffer area. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that they also added a walkway from Howard Street to the door entrances for each unit. Mr. McCarthy asked Mr. Caccioppoli for the width of the front porches. 8 (3/23/23) �Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the front porches would be 4 feet wide. Mr. McCarthy stated that 4 feet is not wide for seating when you incorporate the railings and columns. David Delardi is a landscape architect with Natureview Design Group representing the applicant. Mr. Delardi summarized the locations of the proposed native street trees and plantings. Mr. Delardi stated that the plan proposes a 6 x 6-privacy wall in between each unit patio, to match the siding on the house, and to provide a private green space for each unit. Mr. Delardi stated that the plan proposes to install 6-foot high white vinyl fencing with vines that will grow on it. Mr. Delardi stated that the plan proposes to use Cambridge type paver stones for the walkways and patios. Acting Chairperson Harries asked if this is the first time, the Planning Board is seeing the proposed landscape plan. Mr. Delardi stated that they did not submit the landscape plan to the Board. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Caccioppoli to confirm that the variances would be required for setbacks only. Mr. Cacciopolli stated that variances would only be required for the property setbacks. Acting Chairperson Harries stated that the application has shown improvement and suggested that the applicant meet with Village staff and consultants prior to the next Planning Board meeting to resolve outstanding issues. Mr. Caccioppoli asked Ms. Harries to recap the outstanding issues. Acting Chairperson Harries stated that he should confirm the parking space layout, the landscape buffer, and the mechanical equipment layouts. Ben Nielsen suggested that the applicant review the impervious surface calculations and the parking spaces as they relate to the proximity of the building, and how much backup space is required. Mr. Caccioppoli asked when the application goes before the Zoning Board. Joshua Subin stated that meeting with Sean McCarthy and Village staff would advance the progress of the application. The Planning Board will make a positive recommendation to the Zoning Board for the proposed variances when they feel the Site Plan is ready. Gabriel Arango stated that he is the owner of the property. Mr. Arrango stated that he appreciates their help and that he wants the best for Sleepy Hollow. No action was taken. 6. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, 9 (3/23/23) �Phase II –Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalPresentation Acting Chairperson Harries stated that the applicant has requested an adjournment until the April 20, 2023 meeting. No action was taken. 7. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development Block O/P & N Townhomes Phase II, Architectural Review approval- Presentation Bill McGuiness is the founder of Sun Homes and stated that they are doing Blocks O & P and N. Mr. McGuiness stated that they are seeking approval for the “Kit of Parts” for the block of units that include two 24-foot wide interior units and two 28-foot wide end units. Mr. McGuiness summarized the approved Kit of Parts for the first group of townhomes. Mr. McGuiness stated that all four sides of the building would be brick in lieu of Hardie Plank siding on the back of the building. Mr. McGuiness presented a front perspective for the proposed block of townhome end units and stated that the different elements he is proposing for this building include changes to the window mullion patterns and the stepping out of the bay window proportions to be larger and more animated. The end units will have a colony of French doors with transoms and 11-foot high ceilings in lieu of 10 feet high. The French doors will open against the columns and click shut against the column to for views of the park. The bay windows on the end units will be stepped back to create a balcony off the master bedroom. The ends are stepped back 10 feet to allow for larger rooftop terraces. The interior unit bay elements will step down in proportion to provide a balcony on the main living level. The units will have limestone sills and lintels in lieu of the specified pre-cast materials. Mr. McGuiness presented renderings of the proposed building, the Block N pool, and a rendering of the first approved building block prepared by their marketing company. Mr. McGuiness stated that Sun Homes design the buildings, and they build them as the General Contractor so they have more control over the construction than most people do. The benefit of this is that they are able to coordinate everything through construction. Mr. McGuiness stated that they are proposing to install (2) double 3-foot tall condenser units for the heat pumps clustered as far in from the edge of the roof as possible. All penetrations required for bathroom exhaust fans, pressure intake, and exhausts for ranges, and all plumbing vents will be through the roof by using web wood floor joists so they can run everything without chases. All of the meters would be located in less prominent locations and clustered together on one side of the building. There will not be meters installed on the building elevations that face the train circle or in the front or backs of the building. Fire alarm strobes and truss diagrams will be located underneath the bottom of the bay windows. The percentage of the fourth floor as related to the floor below it will be at 50 percent of the reduced third floor level and 46% percent of the footprint of the level below. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McGuiness if the plan will comply with the conditions of the of the original resolution approval Mr. McGuiness stated that he originally designed the building as five unit building by mistake. After receiving the mirroring comment, he realized it was not as much that he was trying to mirror the building next door but more of a vertical verses horizontal thing. Mr. McGuiness stated that he received the comments on the vertical garden opportunities and stated that he will 10 (3/23/23) �be coming back with details for the planters and drainage as well as incorporating the landscaping from the drawings onto the renderings. Acting Chairperson Harries summarized the conditions of the approved resolution and asked Mr. McGuiness to describe if and how the proposed plan will comply. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McGuiness if the plans include roof pergolas. Mr. McGuinness stated that the plans do not include roof pergolas. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McGuiness if there is a chance that owners will want to install their own temporary shading devices. Mr. McGuiness stated that there will be pre-approved awning designs and that they will not allow it as part of the limited common property rules. There will be optional door treatments with built-in sunshades that the owners can have. Benjamin Nielsen asked Mr. McGuiness if having the highly visible white building material would be appropriate for the interaction of Edge-on-Hudson with the open space and the Kingsland buffer. Mr. McGuiness stated that the white is subjective and that he designed the white bay window elements to step up and down to be a visible signature part of the design. Mr. McGuiness stated that they agreed to come in for ARB approval on every building and that are supposed to vary the building designs as they go. Mr. McGuinness stated that if it feels overpowering, they will adjust as they go. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McGuiness to confirm what the white material is. Mr. McGuiness stated that the white material is large Azek panels that is a PVC material. Mr. McGuiness stated that Hardie Plank connections are difficult to install correctly. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McGuiness if the Azek panels came in other colors and suggested it may tone down the façade and not be so white. Mr. McGuiness stated that he prefers and likes the panels in white and says that UV rays have less effect on white. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McGuiness if the same material is proposed for the enclosed roof area. Mr. McGuiness stated that the enclosed roof area materials is white Versatex, which is a PVC material similar to Fypon, with a high density and flashing on top. Benjamin Sirota asked Mr. McGuines where the limestone is proposed Mr. McGuiness stated that the windowsills and lentils will be limestone and that the windows will be recessed with 2 x 4 jamb details and full brick return. Mr. McGuiness stated that the 211 (3/23/23) �foot stepping in of the buildings and the window depths create shadow lines and definition between the units. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McGuiness what material is proposed for the low wall at the crown molding along the base of the building. Mr. McGuiness stated that the plans specifies pre-cast materials, but he hopes to change to limestone. Mr. Sirota asked Mr. McGuiness how the mechanical equipment is accessible. Mr. McGuiness stated that a ladder from the roof terrace would provide access to the mechanical equipment. Mr. McGuiness stated that the flat roof on the fourth level will have internal roof drains and the roof terrace and decks below will have scuppers and leaders. Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. McGuiness if they have considered solar energy. Mr. McGuiness stated that they are awaiting a proposal for a solar system. Acting Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McGuiness if his intention is to come back before the Board with a better reiteration of the building with a non-mirroring façade. Mr. McGuiness stated that he will back in April with a revised submission and welcomes any opportunity to work with the Village Architect. Mr. McGuiness requested that the Board provide him with any comments of serious concern. No action was taken. 9. Approval of minutes- February 16, 2023 Motion was made to approve the minutes from the February 16, 2023 meeting. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Carney Acting Chairperson Gebler - yes Erin Carney - yes Kersten Harries- yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Benjamin Sirota - abstained Vote 4-0-1 APPROVED The meeting was adjourned at 9:30 PM. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Harries Vote 6-0 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 12 (3/23/23) �Exhibit #1 �Exhibit #2 Date : To March 20, 2023 : Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board From : William C. White Subject : 46 Hudson Street I am writing to formally request an expeditious reversal of the determinations rendered by the Zoning Board concerning the construction endeavor situated at 46 Hudson St. As an authoritative agency, the Zoning Board bears a vital responsibility to uphold zoning regulations and ordinances that safeguard the health, welfare, and security of the community, in addition to ensuring the protection of property values. It is untenable that in this particular instance, the Zoning Board has failed to uphold its obligations by authorizing the reduction of the northern setback from 5 feet to 30 inches. This decision will have a destructive impact on the structural value of 48 Hudson Street, which has maintained a 10-foot expanse between edifices for over 120 years while being owned by an African American family. Furthermore, I must direct your attention to the evident economic disparity that this authorization would engender amongst neighboring properties. While the value of the property owned by my African American family would decrease precipitously, the property of the white neighbor at 42 Hudson St. would undergo a substantial appreciation in value due to the expansion of the gap between structures. This is an insupportable result that the Zoning Board must not permit. It is pertinent to recall recent investigative news reports that have spotlighted the unfair devaluation of residences owned by minorities on the grounds of their ethnicity. I would like to underscore that there are fewer than a dozen African American homeowners in the Village of Sleepy Hollow, underscoring the imperative for the Zoning Board to act with impartiality. The optics of this circumstance are unfavorable, and the determination made by the Zoning Board raises serious doubts about its objectivity and motivations. In summation, I implore you to scrutinize the factual information articulated in Ms. Clara Teagle's memorandum to the board along with my technical concerns raised in my previous memorandum. I urge you to take swift action and rescind the authorization granted by the Zoning Board for the construction undertaking at 46 Hudson St. This determination must be rectified to guarantee the equitable treatment of all members of this community and the safeguarding of their rights. Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-03-23_Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text