https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/1c1334034a8e3bce7860870843ab81ad.pdf ded52153dc2f20055aa3d7c3f853566e PDF Text Text Village of Sleepy Hollow Planning Board Minutes September 21, 2023 Chairperson Harries called the regular meeting to order at 7:12 PM. Chairperson Harries listed the Board members present. Chairperson Harries said this would be Erin Carney’s last meeting and thanked her for her service to the Planning Board. Chairperson Harries summarized the applications on the agenda. Present: Kersten Harries, Chairperson Benjamin Nielsen Rachelle Gebler Erin Carney Lindsay Krakauer Also Present: Joshua Subin, Village Attorney James Natarelli, Village Engineer David Smith, Village Planner Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board Absent: Caroline Chen Clare Trapasso Agenda: 1) 61 Howard St. Realty LLC, 61 Howard Street, Proposed conversion to a two-family residence, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Continued public hearing, draft resolution 2) Gabe Realty Corp., 305 North Washington Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Public hearing 3) Pokahoe Riverview Manor LLC, 17 Pokahoe Drive, Proposed single-family residence, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Preliminary presentation 4) Connor and Elizabeth Ginley, 5 Evergreen Way, Single-family residence, Amended Site Plan approval 5) Hudson Pines, LLC, 180 Bedford Road, Amended Site Plan approval 6) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II- Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalDiscussion 7) Approval of minutes, July 27, 2023 1 (9/21/23) �1. 61 Howard St. Realty LLC, 61 Howard Street, Proposed conversion to a two-family residence, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval- Continued Public hearing, draft resolution Chairperson Harries moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: Krakauer Vote 5-0 John Lentini is the architect representing the applicant. Mr. Lentini stated that he worked with the Village Tree Officer and has selected landscaping that would tolerate potential flooding on the property. Both the applicants' and the neighboring properties are level and impermeable. The existing Lilac tree will remain in the front yard. Mr. Lentini stated that he was advised to plant Inkberry Hollys three feet on center along both sides of the property line. Three flowering Dogwood trees are proposed in the rear yard. One Evergreen Hicks Yew is proposed at the end of the driveway. Mr. Lentini stated that there are no proposed changes to the bulk of the building. The proposed project requires approval for the change of use from a single-family to a twofamily residence. Chairperson Harries stated that the applicant received approval from the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 26, 2023. Chairperson Harries stated that the proposed site plan will be an asset to the applicant and an improvement for the neighboring properties. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the public. There were no public comments. Eric Carney requested Mr. Lentini indicate a native Dogwood tree species on the final Site Plan. Chairperson Harries moved to close the public hearing. Moved: Harries Seconded: Nielsen Vote 5-0 Chairperson Harries requested that David Smith read the highlights of the draft resolution. David Smith read the resolve clauses and the conditions of the draft resolution. Rachelle Gebler moved to approve the resolution. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Carney Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Lindsay Krakauer - yes Erin Carney - yes Vote 5-0 APPROVED 2 (9/21/23) �2. Gabe Realty Corp., 305 North Washington Street, Proposed three-family residence Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval- Public hearing Chairperson Harries read the public notice. Lindsay Krakauer moved to open the public hearing. Moved: Krakauer Seconded: Nielsen Vote 5-0 Greg Caccioppoli stated that he is the engineer representing the applicant. The applicant received variance approvals from the Zoning Board of Appeals for the front yard setback and parking. The changes submitted include relocating the air conditioning units between the window wells at the rear of the building and eliminating one parking space on the property. Chairperson Harries requested that Mr. Caccioppoli provide details of the proposed floor plans for the public. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the application proposes a three-unit residential dwelling with two bedrooms in each unit. The bathroom was removed from the lower level, and the basement will be used for storage, laundry, and utilities. Chairperson Harries stated that the Planning Board intended for the applicant to acknowledge that the basement level could be used as a bedroom if they kept the bathroom and requested the required variance. Chairperson Harries stated that the Zoning Board granted the required variance so the applicant could proceed with the basement bathroom as long as the window well and emergency egress were constructed per Code requirements. Chairperson Harries requested that revised plans represent what they intend to build for the next meeting. James Natarelli requested that the window well details include an accommodation for drainage. Mr. Caccioppoli and James Natarelli agreed to discuss the drainage system to determine the solution. Mr. Caccioppoli described the second-floor and attic plans. Chairperson Harries asked if each unit would have a separate attic storage space. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that each unit would have a separate attic storage space. Benjamin Nielsen asked Mr. Caccioppoli why the parking lot is asymmetrical and has different widths along the building and the property line. Providing more width in the buffer area may allow for more plantings and reduce the impervious surface area. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the parking lot width is designed to provide proper backup space, and the buffer area prevents the cars from hitting the building. David Delardi stated that he is the Landscape Architect for the project. Mr. Delardi suggested using structural soil under the asphalt and planting three or four trees in the buffer area with drip irrigation and porous pavers. 3 (9/21/23) �Rachelle Gebler asked Mr. Caccioppoli if space number one could be a regular-sized parking space. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that he could shift the space to accommodate a regular-sized parking space. Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. Caccioppoli to describe the function of the paved space in the corner of the buffer. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the paved space in the corner would be used for snow removal. The Board suggested that the applicant eliminate the asphalt in the corner buffer area and add a tree. Erin Carney asked Mr. Caccippoli to describe where the garbage and recycling collection area is located. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that a 10-foot by 4-foot garbage collection area is proposed along the back of the parking area near the patio area. The enclosure could be enlarged to provide for recycling. Chairperson Harries suggested providing an area for bicycle parking. Mr. Caccioppoli said he would try to incorporate bicycle parking in the corner buffer area. Mr. Caccioppoli requested to discuss the letter received from the Westchester County Planning Department. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the owner asked that he convey that there needs to be a minimum of six units proposed to qualify for affordable housing. There will not be an impact on the County Sewer because they are proposing three units where originally there were five dwelling units. Stormwater management is being addressed on-site. James Natarelli stated that some calculations and changes are required for the size of the drainage systems to accommodate stormwater management. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Caccioppoli if the applicant has considered green building technology methods. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the applicant is considering making the units solar ready and he will check to confirm that the current electric loads in the parking lot would allow for electrical vehicle charging. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Caccioppoli to confirm the proposed heating and cooling systems. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the proposed utilities would all be electric except gas for stoves. 4 (9/21/23) �Mr. Natarelli requested that Mr. Caccioppoli provide more detail for the grading on the western side of the property. Mr. Natarelli requested that Mr. Caccioppoli confirm that the location of the air conditioning units between the patios works with the landscape plan. Mr. Delardi said he would revise the landscape plan to show the plantings relocated. The plantings can be easily pruned to provide the required clearance to access the equipment. Mr. Natarelli asked Mr. Caccioppoli to describe the electrical service to the house. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the plan is to utilize the electricity on the opposite side of Howard Street by pulling the power line overhead to a private utility pole on the property and running underground to the structure as recommended by Con Edison. Mr. Natarelli asked if there were options to bring the electricity underground from the opposite side of the street to the house. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that he would discuss the options with Con Edison. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the public. Patricia Minchalo stated that she owns 16 Howard Street and asked if overnight parking could be provided in front of the driveway on the street for the neighbors. Mr. Caccioppoli stated they are providing a net gain of three spaces with the parking on the site. There were no other public comments. Mr. Nielsen requested that Mr. Caccioppoli provide the specifications for site lighting requirements related to the proposed bollards. Chairperson Harries moved to adjourn the public hearing to the October 19, 2023 meeting and directed staff to draft a resolution. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Nielsen Vote 5-0 3. Pokahoe Riverview Manor LLC, 17 Pokahoe Drive, Proposed single-family residence, Site Plan and Architectural Review Approval - Preliminary presentation Chairperson Harries stated that the applicant met with the Board during a special work session earlier in the month, where they presented the initial plans and neighborhood studies. Chairperson Harries stated that the Building Department has continued to work with the applicant regarding floor area ratio calculations and to address the comments from the Board. The Board has not had the opportunity to review the submission they received yesterday. Chairperson Harries requested that the applicant highlight the changes made to the Site Plan since the work session. Ronald Pohl stated that he owns the property and thanked the Board for meeting with him. Mr. Pohl stated that he met with Sean McCarthy to discuss the board's comments and the floor area ratio calculations. 5 (9/21/23) �Greg Caccioppoli stated that he is the engineer representing the applicant. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the changes submitted relate to his Site Plan drawings, the Landscape Plan, and the floor area ratio. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the proposed pool structure has been shifted so the base of the wall is within the required 10-foot side yard setback. The wall is proposed to jog out to support the pool equipment. The pool and the surrounding walls were lowered by 1 foot. The rear walkways were reconfigured. A staircase is proposed off the deck to meet landings on the left and right sides to a lower platform with stone steps that offer access to the pool or the rear yard. Pavers were added to the perimeter of the driveway. The pavers are 2 feet wide in some areas, 6 feet wide at the driveway, and 5 feet wide at the entrance to the garage. The wall on the north side of the property was reconfigured to curve and be graded up to reduce the wall height to 1-1/2 feet tall at the curved portion and the highest point of 3 feet. The wall is offset 1-1/2 feet from the property line for stormwater runoff. The front walkways were reduced to one walkway leading to the driveway. The staircase was eliminated from the south side of the property, and the existing grade will remain. Specifications for the air conditioning units were submitted. Two condensers will be located on the lower tier to provide the correct separation requirements, and one condenser will be on the lower tier. Mr. Pohl stated that because they lowered the pool and the retaining walls, the fencing on the side of the property was eliminated. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that he didn’t finalize the stormwater design for this submission. James Natarelli witnessed them perform the soil tests, and it was apparent that the site would support an infiltration-type system. David Delardi stated he is the Landscape Architect from Nature View Design Group representing the applicant. Mr. Delardi stated that some of the plantings have changed due to the reconfigurations of the Site Plan. A guard rail has been added on top of the wall along the driveway for vehicle protection. Chairperson Harries asked for the height of the guard rail and the total height when added to the top of the wall. Mr. Caccioppoli stated that the guard rail is 27 inches high, and when added to the top of the wall, the total height will be 5 feet, 7 inches. Sean McCarthy stated that a maximum height of five feet is permitted to comply with the Zoning Code. Mr. Caccioppoli asked if the walls around the pool have the same height requirements. Mr. McCarthy stated that pool enclosures have separate requirements. Mr. Delardi stated that the goal was to maintain a natural feel with rock outcroppings and natural slab stones. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Delardi to describe how the patio and low wall on the site plans coordinate with the landscape plan. 6 (9/21/23) �Mr. Delardi stated that the patio and low wall will be removed and replaced with landscaping. Benjamin Nielsen asked Mr. Caccioppoli if the stonework around the pool would be dark gray. Mr. Pohl stated that the stone will blend with the natural rock on the site and the brick proposed for the house's exterior. Rachelle Gebler suggested they consider using a brick color similar to the other brick houses in the neighborhood to provide some dark accents. Michael Finelli is the architect representing the applicant and stated that they avoided the darker brick colors so that the house size would better match the surrounding neighborhood and not be overpowering. Chairperson Harries said she visited the site and noticed how many trees have already been cut down. The application proposes to remove two more trees. Chairperson Harries strongly advocates that no more trees be cut down. The requested tree removal within 10 feet of the proposed house is a self-created problem because it is for a new house. Keeping the larger oldgrowth trees is important to help the house blend in and avoid massing the house standing alone from the street. They should aim to preserve the remaining trees. Mr. Pohl stated that one of the trees hangs over the neighbor's house. Mr. Pohl stated that he is concerned that the other tree will fall in a storm and damage the other canopy trees because it is on a shallow ridge with no soil. Mr. Pohl stated that he plans on contributing a nice sum of money to the Village to plant trees. Ms. Gelber stated there are a lot of trees that overhang houses in the neighborhood. The tree in the middle of the south side of the property should remain if it is healthy. Mr. Delardi provided more details about the proposed landscaping and how it would help integrate the house into the neighborhood. Mr. Nielsen stated that the plan has improved from the previous version. Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the consultants. Sean McCarthy stated if the Board is comfortable, they can schedule a public hearing. Any additional comments regarding the recent submission can be forwarded to the applicant. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. McCarthy if the application complies with the floor area ratio requirements. Mr. McCarthy stated that the calculations are under the maximum permitted FAR. Rachelle Gebler moved to schedule a public hearing for the October 19, 2023 meeting. Moved: Gebler Seconded: Krakauer 7 (9/21/23) �Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Lindsay Krakauer - yes Erin Carney - yes Vote 5-0 APPROVED 4. Connor & Elizabeth Ginley, 5 Evergreen Way, Single-Family residence, Amended Site Plan Approval- Preliminary presentation Mike Doebbler stated he is an associate with Ralph Mastromonaco Engineering, representing the applicants. Mr. Doebbler stated that the original site plan was approved in 2021. The applicants have completed most of the construction and live in the house under a temporary Certificate of Occupancy. The applicants seek minor site plan amendments related to the approved Landscape Plan and fencing. Based on conversations with Peter Strom, the Village Tree Officer, there were changes made to some of the plantings on the site. Due to minor grading issues, a retaining wall was constructed around the backyard to the side of the house to level the rear yard. Two fence returns with gates are proposed along the east and west property boundaries. Chairperson Harries stated that the Board received two letters from neighboring property owners supporting the requested changes. (See Exhibits #1 and #2) Chairperson Harries solicited comments from the Board and consultants. There were no comments from the Board or consultants. Chairperson Harries said she visited the site and has no objections to the proposed changes. Benjamin Nielsen moved to waive the public hearing and direct staff to draft a resolution for the October 19, 2023 meeting. Moved: Nielsen Seconded: Gebler Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Lindsay Krakauer - yes Erin Carney - yes Vote 5-0 APPROVED 5. Hudson Pines, LLC, 180 Bedford Road, Amended Site Plan Approval - Preliminary presentation Kimberly Martelli stated that she is the principal of KTM Architect, representing the applicant. Ms. Martelli stated that the prior Site Plan approval was granted on April 20, 2023. The application proposes constructing retaining walls with tiered landscaping to act as a buffer between the structures known as the Carriage House, now called the Sports Complex, and the 8 (9/21/23) �Music Room. Ms. Martelli presented the last approved plan highlighting the area of impervious surfaces proposed for the plaza and courtyard between the two structures. The application proposes a modified courtyard plan to allow access between the Sports Complex and the Music room and to provide cross-access from the main house to a patio. The proposed retaining walls will connect closest to Bedford Road corners at the natatorium attached to the Sports Complex. They will curve to the existing retaining wall and tie into the corner of the Music Room. There are two retaining walls proposed as tiered walls where one wall would sit lower on the site to allow for a service walkway for staff to travel from the Sports Complex to the lower level of the Music Room. Plantings are proposed along the tiered walls and will provide for level grading around the base. Ms. Martelli presented the sections for the proposed retaining wall locations and described the proposed wall heights in relation to the property grades. Ms. Martelli stated that Landscape Plans were prepared by Christopher Thorp, Landscape Architect, to size the retaining walls to create the planting tiers properly. Chairperson Harries asks if the proposed plantings are intended to screen the buildings visible from the Road. Ms. Martelli stated that the planting tiers at the retaining walls are further in the property. The plantings proposed between Bedford Road and the buildings were previously approved. Ms. Martelli presented renderings to show the proposed height of the walls from different views of the site. Benjamin Nielsen asked if the function of the tall wall is for privacy. Ms. Martelli stated that the walls are intended for privacy and to provide screening and connections between the two buildings with a steep slope. The garden wall is proposed as an attractive backdrop feature to the courtyard. Mr. Nieslen asked Ms. Martelli to describe the current conditions of the proposed wall locations. Ms. Martelli stated that there is an existing retaining wall and steep grade drop where the garden wall is proposed. Ms. Martelli stated that although the application will increase the impervious surface by 313 square feet, they intend to take a small portion of the plaza area and replace it with impervious pavers. Chairperson Harries stated that having a site visit will make it easier for the Board to understand the context of her presentation. Mr. Nielsen stated that Bedford Road is a historical road for the community, so screening is important. Chairperson Harries asked Ms. Martelli what is proposed to soften the view of the structures currently seen from Bedford Road. Sean McCarthy said he will coordinate a Site Visit with the Planning and Zoning Board of Appeals. 9 (9/21/23) �Ms. Martelli stated that she would provide a mock-up with stakes and construction taping of the wall heights on the site. Ms. Martelli requested that the Board refer the application to the Zoning Board of Appeals for the October meeting. Ms. Martelli stated that approval to construct the walls would allow them to start the planting between the buildings and Bedford Road. Christopher Thorp, the Landscape Architect, stated that they could start planting some of the evergreen plantings in the fall if the walls were completed, which would soften the view from Bedford Road. There was a discussion between the Board and the consultants regarding referring the application to the Zoning Board. Chairperson Harries stated that the Board prefers a site visit before referring the application to the Zoning Board. 6. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development, Phase II, Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan & Wetlands Watercourse Permit approvalDiscussion Chairperson Harries stated that the Board held a Special Work Session at the end of July’s Planning Board meeting in which there was a lengthy discussion regarding FEMA maps and the buffer zone as a floodway. The Board received a report from WSP on Wednesday that will be reviewed by Woodard & Curran. The Board requested that the applicant have an agreement that ensures that the water access requirements will be fulfilled in a supplemental design submission for the remainder of the Park. Chairperson Harries requested that the applicant provide updates and present the plan discussed in July for public record. Peter Chavkin is a Managing Member of Biddle Real Estate Ventures on behalf of Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC. Mr. Chavkin stated that on August 7, 2023 there was a follow-up conversation with WSP Engineers and Woodard & Curran. WSP prepared responses to Woodard & Curran’s technical memo and circulated it on September 8, 2023. Additional questions were submitted by Woodard & Curran, and WSP submitted modeling information on September 20, 2023. They hoped that the modeling calculations would result in a smaller volume of flood water coming across the Metro-North railroad tracks. The models showed a raised amount of flood water over the tracks and raised the base flood elevation by a couple of inches. Mr. Chavkin stated that the results are well within the tolerances they were designed for. Mr. Chavkin stated that there is a draft agreement addressing the water access requirements being reviewed by the attorneys and the Mayor. Mr. Chavkin stated that they have been conducting studies with their maritime engineers on modifying the water access point by the cove to meet the Planning Board's ten-point objectives. They are making progress and hope to have something they could share in a work session in a month and a half. Mr. Chavkin presented the plans and described the changes requested by the Planning Board. The changes for the North Buffer area include expanding the Planting area to make it feel lusher and adding a secondary pathway to Kingsland Point Park. There are changes to the green pathway materials, between the shrub area, and boulder seating was added along the path. The grading of the slope for the channel area was eased. The changes for the third section of Tappan Zee Park include raising the crosswalk area as an additional traffic route and integrating the open 10 (9/21/23) �space areas. Loading zones for future park uses were added for dropping someone off or unloading a kyack. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Chavkin to confirm that he seeking approval for the final leg of the Tappan Zee Park and the Buffer zone only at this point and that there will be a legal agreement forthcoming referring to the water access requirements in the remaining part of the park that is not included in this submission. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Chavkin to confirm that there will also be a forthcoming report to address the comments related to the buffer zone and the floodway. Mr. Chavkin stated that they are seeking approval for the portions of the park included in the submission and that an agreement for the water access requirements will be finalized. Mr. Chavkin stated that it is productive to consider the issues of Pocantico River flood waters separate by the physical drainage solutions and the regulatory issue as to whether this area has to be mapped as a floodway. The regulatory question continues to exist. Mr. Chavkin stated that his understanding is that Woodard & Currans' review of the modeling prepared by WSP will address the drainage issue and not the regulatory issue. Mr. Chavkin stated that resolving the drainage questions is important. As of today, the area is not in a flood zone, and it would be either Zone X, which is not in the 100-year flood zone or an unmapped area. Chairperson Harries asked if the area would function in a 100-year storm event, even if unmapped. Mr. Chavkin stated that the modeling work completed by WSP in response to Woodard & Currans' comments shows that the flood waters rose very slightly in the buffer area, but the drainage works. The Planning Board should be able to approve the application because it is not a mapped regulatory area, and the drainage works. James Natarelli stated that Woodard & Curran is reviewing the model submitted by WSP and recommends that they weigh-in on the regulatory requirements. Mr. Nielsen requested that Mr. McCarthy ask Woodard and Curran to investigate the regulatory requirements of the FEMA process. Mr. Nielsen stated that he is concerned about the Board approving the buffer area without knowing if there may be requirements that will affect the design if they determine the area needs to be a mapped floodway. Chairperson Harries asked Mr. Chavkin to confirm that if regulatory changes are required for the buffer area, they would return for amended site plan approval and make the changes. Mr. Chavkin stated that it is possible that a regulatory agency may disagree with a calculation and determine that the buffer area is at a Flood Level and doesn’t work; then they would change the site as required at their expense. WSP has significant experience in dealing with FEMA, and when the area was designed, the model showed that the drainage works. Mr. Chavkin stated that in his experience, while the East Parcel has flooded, water has never come over the train tracks. Chairperson Harries moved to schedule the public hearing for the October 19, 2023 Planning Board meeting. Moved: Harries Seconded: Krakauer 11 (9/21/23) �Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Lindsay Krakauer - yes Erin Carney - yes Vote 5-0 APPROVED Chairperson Harries stated that the progress of the waterfront agreement and the floodway information needs to be satisfactory for them to approve the application in October. 7. Approval of minutes, July 27, 2023 Chairperson Harries moved to approve the minutes. Moved: Harries Seconded: Kakauer Chairperson Harries - yes Rachelle Gebler - yes Benjamin Nielsen - yes Lindsay Krakauer - yes Erin Carney - abstained Vote 4-0-1 APPROVED Chairperson Harries moved to adjourn the meeting at 9:20 PM. Moved: Harries Seconded: Gebler Vote 5-0 Respectfully submitted, Pamela Kroll Secretary to the Planning Board 12 (9/21/23) �Exhibit #1 �Exhibit #2 Subject: Date: 5 Evergreen -Support Correspondence from 47 Hemlock Drive Thursday, September 21, 2023 10:17:22 AM From: Contact form at Sleepy Hollow NY <cmsmailer@civicplus.com> Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2023 10:04 AM To: Pamela Kroll <pkroll@sleepyhollowny.org> Subject: [Sleepy Hollow NY] Site Plan Amendment, 5 Evergreen Way (Sent by Edward Barbour, litig8tour@gmail.com) Edward Barbour (litig8tour@gmail.com) has sent you a message via your contact form (https://www.sleepyhollowny.gov/user/1243/contact) at Sleepy Hollow NY. Message: Attached please find our letter of support relative to this site plan amendment. Said letter details that my wife and I own the property located at 47 Hemlock Drive in Sleepy Hollow. The applicant Connor Ginley is our rear yard neighbor. He has informed us that he desires to make minor adjustments to a previously filed Site Plan relating to landscaping, fence and wall, Please be advised that we have no objections to said amendment and, in fact, fully support this application. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource MINS_PLAN_2023-09-21 Approved Planning Board Minutes Subject The topic of the resource Planning Board Minutes & Resolutions-2023 Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2023 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved. Type The nature or genre of the resource Text