<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="3617" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/items/show/3617?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-19T10:12:37+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="3631">
      <src>https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/85c3756cf0a45f73883d1664a9225428.pdf</src>
      <authentication>3a5c25fbc6ebcc0cb44d655e90acaf14</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="52">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="24794">
                  <text>Village of Sleepy Hollow
Planning Board Minutes
March 20, 2025
Chairperson Krakauer called the meeting to order at 7:23 PM.
Chairperson Krakauer read the agenda.
Present:

Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson
Chris Camia
Richard Gross
Jay Schulz
Rachelle Gebler
Benjamin Nielsen
Ken Anderson

Also Present:

Joshua B. Subin, Village Attorney
David Smith, Village Planner
James Natarelli, Village Engineer
Sean E. McCarthy, Building Inspector

Absent:

Pamela Kroll, Secretary to the Planning Board

Agenda:
1) Cortlandt Development LLC, 377 North Broadway, Proposed deli/market, Site Plan &amp;
Architectural Review Approval- Continued public hearing
2) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 332-338 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome
Building, Architectural Review Approval- Draft resolution
3) SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development,
Block A Proposed medical office building, Site Plan and Architectural Review ApprovalPublic hearing, Continued public hearing
4) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 340-350 Legend Drive, Proposed (6) Unit Townhome
Building, Architectural Review Approval- Draft resolution
5) One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 349-355 Hollows Pass, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome
Building, Architectural Review Approval- Draft resolution
6) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development,
Phase II- Waterfront Open Space- North Buffer, Amended Site Plan &amp; Wetlands
Watercourse Permit Approval- Draft resolution
7) 50 on Hudson Street, LLC, 50 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence, Site
Plan &amp; ARB Approval- Presentation
8) Marathon Development Group, LTD, 100 College Avenue, Proposed 105-unit mixeduse development, Subdivision, Special Permit, and Site Plan Approval- Presentation
1

(3/20/25)

�9) 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan ApprovalContinued public hearing
10) KWD Realty, LLC, 309-315 North Broadway, Proposed 4-story self-storage facility,
Site Plan &amp; Architectural Review Approval- Discussion
11) Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development,
Phase III- Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan &amp; Wetlands Watercourse Permit ApprovalDiscussion
12) Approval of minutes, February 20, 2025
1. Cortlandt Development, LLC, 377 North Broadway, Proposed deli/market, Site Plan &amp;
Architectural Review Approval- Continued public hearing
Benjamin Nielsen moved to open the public hearing.
Moved: Nielsen
Seconded: Gebler

Vote 7-0

Jonathan Merheb is the engineer from JMER Engineering P.C., representing the property owner.
Mr. Merheb stated that the revised plans include changing the fence from chain link to vinyl,
adding a landscape strip along Pocantico Street, adding surface-mounted bollards for pedestrian
safety, and moving the planters to the sidewalk in front of the building. Mr. Merheb described
the drainage improvements and stated that a vehicular maneuverability diagram demonstrates
safe access from all parking spots.
Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the public.
There were no public comments.
Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board and consultants.
Benjamin Nielsen suggested that large planters anchored in the pavement would be more
aesthetic and provide better safety than bollards.
The Board discussed the options using bollards instead of planters along the storefront.
Mr. Merheb agreed to use decorative steel bollards that incorporate bike racks.
James Natarelli requested that Mr. Merheb revise the civil plans to wrap the front drainage leader
to the rear of the property, address the system overflow, and confirm that the proposed lighting
plan complies with the foot-candle requirements along the property lines.
Mr. Merheb stated that he would address the front leader drain if the elevations permit it, would
provide an open grate instead of a solid cover for overflow, and would relocate or provide
fixtures with less wattage where they are close to the property lines.
David Smith read the conditions of the draft resolution.
Richard Gross moved to close the public hearing and approve the resolution.
2

(3/20/25)

�Moved: Gross

Seconded: Anderson

Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes
Richard Gross- yes
Chris Camia- yes
Rachelle Gebler- yes
Benjamin Nielsen- yes
Jay Schulz- yes
Ken Anderson- yes
Vote 7-0
2. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 332-338 Legend Drive, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome
Building, Architectural Review Approval- Draft resolution
Craig Tompkins is the VP of Landing Development of Biddle Real Estate Ventures, representing
One Kingsland Owner, LLC. Mr. Tompkins stated that the revised plans include a revised cover
sheet, a planning board endorsement block, representation of the previous approvals, addition of
address numbers on the back of the buildings, and revised locations of the rooftop mechanical
equipment.
David Smith asked if the architect determined that the rooftop coverage on the fourth floor is
more than limited to 75% of the area below it.
Mr. Tompkins said he would submit revised calculations showing that the fourth-floor rooftop
complies with the 75% coverage condition.
Mr. Tompkins stated that an enlarged detail of the previously approved landscape plan was
provided to demonstrate the area at the corner of the block.
David Smith requested that future applications include graphics that show comparisons of the
townhome groupings on either side of the proposed building to give the Board a sense of how the
blocks are laid out and avoid excessive similarity in the Kit of Parts.
Mr. Tompkins said he would submit revised application submissions for the upcoming
applications, including comparison graphics, for the next meeting.
David Smith read the draft resolution, design requirements, and approval conditions.
Rachelle Gebler moved to approve the resolution.
Moved: Gebler
Seconded: Nielsen
Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes
Richard Gross- yes
Chris Camia- yes
Rachelle Gebler- yes
Benjamin Nielsen- yes
Jay Schulz- yes
3

(3/20/25)

�Ken Anderson- yes
Vote 7-0
3. SDC Lighthouse Landing Realty, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development
Block A Proposed medical office building, Site Plan &amp; Architectural Review- Continued
public hearing
Richard Gross moved to open the public hearing.
Moved: Gross
Seconded: Anderson

Vote 7-0

Janet Giris is a partner with the law firm of DelBello Donnellan Weingarten Wise &amp; Wiederkehr,
LLP, presenting on behalf of the applicant. Ms. Giris stated at the February meeting that the
Board directed staff to prepare a draft resolution. Modifications were made to the draft resolution
that they reviewed. Mr. Giris stated that the rooftop finish will match, and landscaping would be
corrected on the final site plan drawings.
Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the public.
There were no public comments.
Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board or the consultants.
There were no comments from the Board.
Chairperson Krakauer requested that David Smith read the draft resolution and call out the
changes.
David Smith stated that the revisions received from the Building Department were to reorganize
the conditions related to the general site plan approval, signing of the resolution, issuance of
permits, and the temporary or permanent Certificates of Occupancy. David Smith read the
amended resolve clauses and conditions of the draft resolution.
Ms. Giris requested changes to the wording of the condition related to the required performance
bond for the pedestrian connection in connection with the signing of the resolution.
Ms. Giris asked David Smith to repeat the condition related to the Block A parcel remaining a
taxable lot and to review the dates of the consultant reviews.
Ms. Giris stated that the revised draft resolution conditions are acceptable.
Sean McCarthy stated that the Board discussed the time limits for calling the bond if the
pedestrian stair connection from Beekman Avenue is not completed by September 30, 2025. The
Planning Board shall approve the final construction logistics plan instead of the Building
Inspector.
There was a discussion regarding the conditions for approving the eastern garage elevation mural
and the curb adjustments on Beekman Avenue.
4

(3/20/25)

�Janet Giris requested time to review the revised resolution conditions with the applicant.
Rachelle Gebler moved to close the public hearing.
Moved: Gebler
Seconded: Camia

Vote 7-0

Ms. Giris stated that the Construction Logistics plan is typically prepared when a contractor is on
board and is part of the issuance of the Building Permit. Ms. Giris stated that the professionals
are the appropriate experts to determine the logistics of construction sequencing, and the
Planning Board does not have expertise in that area. Mr. Giris asked what the process for the
Planning Board approval would entail.
Mr. McCarthy stated that the Planning Board typically reviews a conceptual logistics plan. The
submitted logistics plan is insufficient in detailing what will need to happen on the site about
closing sidewalks, parking spaces, pedestrian traffic detours, possible road closures, and
temporary curb cuts. The material staging areas will be located two blocks from the construction
site and will be reduced due to residential properties and the supermarket.
Ms. Giris asked if the logistics plan could be approved as an administrative procedure.
David Smith re-read the resolution conditions related to requiring Planning Board approval. He
proposed modifying the language to read that a conceptual logistics plan will be submitted for
the Planning Board review, with the final plan approval by the Building Department.
Chris Camia agreed that the Board should be able to review the logistics plan and make
suggestions, while Sean McCarthy can provide the enforcement and final review.
Chairperson Krakauer stated she was open to scheduling a work session to review the logistics
plan.
Ms. Giris stated that the applicant is not comfortable with the tax conditions. Ms. Giris stated
that while there is no intention for the property to come off the tax rolls at this time, it is neither
appropriate nor within the Board’s power to require that a property be on the tax rolls in
perpetuity, and questions the legality of it.
Joshua Subin suggested that the Board seek counsel's advice to hear his opinion on the tax
condition.
At 8:33 PM, Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board would hold an advice of counsel session
and resume the meeting.
At 8:51 PM, the Board resumed the meeting.
Chairperson Krakauer requested that David Smith read the alternative proposal to address the
applicants’ concern.

5

(3/20/25)

�David Smith stated that the Board proposes adding two separate whereas clauses to the draft
resolution and agreed to remove condition #10 related to the taxes as follows:
“Whereas the Village of Sleepy Hollow is part of a rezoning of the former General Motors North
Tarrytown Assembly plan that envisioned significant economic redevelopment associated with
the development of the site, and Whereas the applicant has made representations that the
proposed use would be beneficial to the Village’s economic redevelopment.”
Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board is comfortable with the requests.
Ms. Giris stated that she is okay with the revisions based on what she reviewed. Ms. Giris stated
that the last-minute changes to the draft resolution were unsettling. If there are issues, they will
come back before the Board.
Rachelle Gebler moved to approve the resolution.
Moved: Gebler
Seconded: Gross
Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes
Richard Gross- yes
Chris Camia- yes
Rachelle Gebler- yes
Benjamin Nielsen- yes
Jay Schulz- yes
Ken Anderson- yes
Vote 7-0
4. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 340-350 Legend Drive, Proposed (6) Unit Townhome
Building, Architectural Review Approval- Draft resolution
Craig Tompkins is the VP of Landing Development of Biddle Real Estate Ventures, representing
One Kingsland Owner, LLC. Mr. Tompkins stated that the revised plans include a revised cover
sheet, a planning board endorsement block, and representation of the previous approvals,
addition of address numbers on the back of the buildings, and revised locations of the rooftop
mechanical equipment.
David Smith stated that the conditions and requests for the draft resolution are the same as those
detailed for the approval of 332-338 Legend Drive.
Mr. Tompkins said he would submit revised calculations showing that the fourth-floor rooftop
complies with the 75% coverage condition.
Rachelle Gebler moved to approve the resolution.
Moved: Gebler
Seconded: Schulz
Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes
Richard Gross- yes
Chris Camia- yes
6

(3/20/25)

�Rachelle Gebler- yes
Benjamin Nielsen- yes
Jay Schulz- yes
Ken Anderson- yes
Vote 7-0
5. One Kingsland Owner, LLC, 349-355 Hollows Pass, Proposed (4) Unit Townhome
Building, Architectural Review Approval- Draft resolution
Craig Tompkins is the VP of Landing Development of Biddle Real Estate Ventures, representing
One Kingsland Owner, LLC. Mr. Tompkins stated that the revised plans include the same
revisions submitted with the other buildings.
David Smith stated that the conditions and requests of the draft resolution are the same as
detailed for the approvals of 332-338 Legend Drive and 340-350 Legend Drive, with additional
conditions as follows:
The fourth floor's enclosed/ roofed areas shall be limited to less than 75% of the floor below for
interior units.
Fourth-floor enclosed/ roofed areas shall be limited to 50% or less of the floor below for end units
generally open to view or for higher visibility units as may be determined by the Planning Board.
After due consideration, based on documentation provided to the Planning Board dated 2/6/25, the
Planning Board determines that Units #63 and #66 are high visibility units given their frontage on
Hollow Pass and limits the enclosed/roofed area to 50% percent or less for the end units (#63 and
#66) presented as part of the Proposed Action.
Rachelle Gebler moved to approve the resolution.
Moved: Gebler
Seconded: Anderson
Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes
Richard Gross- yes
Chris Camia- yes
Rachelle Gebler- yes
Benjamin Nielsen- yes
Jay Schulz- yes
Ken Anderson- yes
Vote 7-0
6. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development,
Phase II –Waterfront Open Space- North Buffer, Amended Site Plan &amp; Wetlands
Watercourse Permit Approval – Draft resolution
Craig Tompkins stated that no revisions have been made to the plans presented in February. Mr.
Tompkins requested to work with the Building Department to find a solution to identify the
vehicle's emergency access path from Legend Drive to the park. The proposed path will be a
7

(3/20/25)

�grass material that provides stability to hold fire trucks and to be used by pedestrians. Mr.
Tompkins stated that the North Buffer work and the water line extension from Legend Drive to
the Park are proposed to start in May.
Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments and suggestions from the Board.
Benjamin Nielsen suggested using landscape edging as a natural border to delineate the
emergency pathway and asked if Woodard &amp; Curran reviewed the revisions.
Sean McCarthy said that Woodard &amp; Curran has open items that need to be addressed.
Mr. Tompkins stated that Woodard &amp; Curran and WSP are working through the discrepancies
between the engineers and requested that they be allowed to resolve them prior to filing the
Building Permit.
Mr. Nielsen asked Mr. Tompkins to provide a status of the balance of the waterfront park, as the
completion of the buffer channel is part of the Phase III Waterfront Open Space Park.
Mr. Tompkins stated that the certificates of occupancy for the buildings along Hollows Pass rely
on the completion of the North Buffer, landscape, and public parkland in front of them. The
Waterfront Open Space Phase III is tied to the development of Block Q, which is years away.
Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Tompkins for the estimated completion date of the North
Buffer.
Mr. Tompkins stated they are committed to completing the North Buffer before Building M on
Hollows Pass is occupied.
Chris Camia asked if the completion of the North Buffer would trigger access from Legend
Drive up to the circle.
Mr. Tompkins stated that the road would be open to the circle except for Hollows Pass when the
first Building M seeks occupancy. He estimates that it should be completed by the end of the
year.
David Smith read the resolve clauses and the conditions of the draft resolution.
The Board discussed the conditions of the draft resolution.
Richard Gross moved to approve the resolution.
Moved: Gross
Seconded: Camia
Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes
Richard Gross- yes
Chris Camia- yes
Rachelle Gebler- yes
Benjamin Nielsen- yes
8

(3/20/25)

�Jay Schulz- yes
Ken Anderson- yes
Vote 7-0
7. 50 on Hudson Street, LLC, 50 Hudson Street, Proposed three-family residence
Site Plan &amp; Architectural Review Approval – Presentation
Brian Hopkins is the owner and architect of the property. Mr. Hopkins stated that the proposed
changes to the building façade materials include using a lighter color board and batten fiber
cement siding with wood accents, decking and window separations. Mr. Hopkins presented an
alternative slanted parking layout, described how it would provide larger parking spaces, and
allow for possible tandem parking.
The Board suggested architectural design changes to the stair risers and railings, window trims,
roof style, front porch, and color schemes to resemble the adjacent properties.
Mr. Hopkins stated that there is a strong precedent for modern building architecture elements
created from the Edge-on-Hudson Development and neighboring properties. The Planning Board
approved a similar parking arrangement at 46 Hudson Street. Mr. Hopkins described how the
proposed front stoop provides a better solution than a front porch and reduces the size of the
building from the streetscape.
Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Hopkins if a variance is required for the proposed wall along
the driveway.
Mr. Hopkins stated that he removed the proposed retaining wall.
There was a discussion between Mr. Natarelli and Mr. Hopkins regarding the proposed
stormwater calculations of the shared driveway impervious surfaces, whether a drainage
easement will be required, regulations for compact parking spaces, and the maximum driveway
grade percentages.
No action was taken.
8. Marathon Development Group LTD, 100 College Avenue, Proposed 105-unit
mixed-use development, Subdivision, Special Permit, and Site Plan ApprovalPresentation
Brian Sinsabaugh stated that he is an attorney with Zarin &amp; Steinmetz on behalf of the applicant,
Marathon Development Group, LTD. Mr. Sinsabaugh stated that the team met with the
consultants and the Building Inspector on February 25, 2025, the Board of Trustees on March 4,
2025, and the Local Development Corporation (LDC) on March 10, 2025. Meetings were held
with LDC on March 24, 2025, and the Board of Trustees on March 25, 2025. Mr. Sinsabaugh
stated that the submitted parking surveys prepared by Kimley Horn determined that, based on the
studies, 172 parking spaces are needed for the residential units and 8 spaces are required for the
retail per Code, for a total of 180 spaces, where they propose to provide 200 parking spaces. Mr.
Sinsabaugh stated that a hydrant flow test was conducted on March 5, 2025.
9

(3/20/25)

�They are working with the LDC on the citing criteria for the Special Permit, in which the Village
of Sleepy Hollow must have an ownership stake in the property. They are reviewing and
executing a proposed joinder agreement with the LDC to take an ownership stake in the property.
He stated that the application is complete and requested that the Planning Board circulate intent
as the declared lead agency.
Chairperson Krakauer solicited comments from the Board and consultants.
David Smith stated that the issue regarding density arose during the work session. Mr. Smith
asked the applicant to describe how density and the proposed unit count were determined.
Ed Vogal is the project architect from Warshaurer Mellusi Washaurer Architects. Mr. Vogal
stated that the requested increase in density was calculated for a viability function, more than a
formula from the Zoning Code or the underlying zoning code. Part of the request is for the
Village Board to allow the proposed density to occur.
Chairperson Krakauer asked how the density was calculated.
Mr. Vogel stated that the density calculation was based on unit count, not unit bedroom counts.
Mr. Smith asked Mr. Vogel how they determined to propose 105 units.
Mr. Vogel stated that the 105-unit count is based on the proposed lot area. The calculation is
based on 10,000 square feet of lot area for the first 15 dwelling units, an additional unit for every
500 square feet of lot area, and applying a 20% bonus. The maximum density for the new lot is
calculated as the permitted density count of 130 units, whereas they are proposing 105 units. Mr.
Vogel asked Sean McCarthy if the Village of Sleepy Hollow Zoning code calculations differ.
Sean McCarthy stated that his calculations per the Village of Sleepy Hollow Zoning Code differ.
David Smith stated that the differences in calculating the proposed density should not necessarily
hold up the circulation of the Notice of Intent action and the days.
Chris Camia asked Mr. Sinsabaugh where those who park in the lot now would park during
construction of the new lot.
Mr. Sinsabaugh stated that it is a continued analysis they are working on, and they have reached
out to some surrounding properties that may be beneficial and are expanding the approach where
they are looking to provide temporary parking and shuttles.
Chairperson Krakauer stated that the Board is concerned about traffic flow and requested that the
construction plan identify local parking areas.
The Board discussed properties that could be used for temporary parking.

10

(3/20/25)

�Mr. Smith reviewed the State Environmental Quality Review Act criteria and stated that his
preliminary findings will classify the proposed application as a Type I action.
Chris Camia stated that the parking study significantly differs from the Zoning Code and does
not accurately depict real time conditions. He is concerned about the reliance of utilizing (9)
public street parking spaces.
Mr. Sinsabaugh stated that the parking studies were based current conditions and that affordable
housing is a unique use.
Benjamin Nielsen moved to direct staff to circulate a Notice of Intent to all interested parties for
the Planning Board to be the Lead Agency for the State Environmental Quality Review process
Moved: Nielsen
Seconded: Camia
Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes
Richard Gross- yes
Chris Camia- yes
Rachelle Gebler- yes
Benjamin Nielsen- yes
Jay Schulz- yes
Ken Anderson- yes
Vote 7-0
9. 16 Hudson Street Realty, 16 Hudson Street, Proposed parking area, Site Plan Approval
-Continued public hearing
Chairperson Krakauer stated that the applicant has requested an adjournment of the public
hearing to the April 24, 2025 meeting.
10. KWD Realty LLC, 309-315 North Broadway, Proposed 4-story self-storage facility
Site Plan &amp; Architectural Review Approval- Discussion
Karl Dibble is the property owner. Mr. Dibble described the revised site plan and renderings.
Mr. Dibble stated that Cronin Engineering is working on the stormwater plans.
There was a discussion between the Board and Mr. Dibble regarding the variances required for
the current plan related to coverage, height, and setbacks in relation to the property grades and
perspective street views.
Chairperson Krakauer asked Mr. Dibble if he had consulted with the Department of
Transportation regarding the three curb cuts.
Mr. Dibble stated that there are currently three curb cuts. The application proposes to relocate
and reduce two of them. The gate will be open from 7:00 AM to 11:00 PM and locked when the
establishment is closed. There will be signage to identify the entrance uses.

11

(3/20/25)

�James Natarelli asked Mr. Dibble to provide details that determine if the driveway to the back of
the building and the adjacent retaining walls in the setback would require a variance.
Mr. Dibble stated that he would confirm if the retaining walls and fencing height would require a
variance, and if he can manipulate the grade to reduce the height without affecting the driveway
slopes.
Mr. Natarelli requested that Mr. Dibble submit the topographic property survey.
There was a discussion between the Board and Mr. Dibble regarding concerns about the
proposed massing of the building, its visual impact on the neighborhood, and the significance of
the variances that he is seeking to construct a non-compliant building.
Rachelle Gebler polled the Board and stated they agree that they are not comfortable making a
positive recommendation to the Zoning Board of Appeals.
The Planning Board agreed that it is appropriate for Mr. Dibble to apply to the Zoning Board of
Appeals, given their concerns regarding the massing, so that the Zoning Board and the public
could weigh in on the requested variances.
The Planning Board provided suggestions that would improve the compliance of the proposed
building.
Sean McCarthy stated that the Planning Board’s comments are part of the record and would be
submitted to the Zoning Board of Appeals.
Mr. Dibble stated that he will apply to the Zoning Board of Appeals.
11. Lighthouse Landing Communities, LLC, Edge-on-Hudson Riverfront Development,
Phase III –Waterfront Open Space, Site Plan &amp; Wetlands Watercourse Permit
Approval – Discussion
Chairperson Krakauer stated that the discussion has been adjourned.
12. Approval of minutes, February 20, 2025
Rachelle Gebler moved to approve the February 20, 2025 meeting minutes.
Moved: Gebler
Seconded: Anderson
Lindsay Krakauer, Chairperson - yes
Richard Gross- yes
Chris Camia- yes
Rachelle Gebler- yes
Benjamin Nielsen- abstained
Jay Schulz- yes
12

(3/20/25)

�Ken Anderson- yes
Vote 6-0-1
Richard Gross moved to adjourn the meeting at 10:58 PM.
Moved: Gross
Seconded: Gebler

Vote 7-0

Respectfully submitted,
Pamela Kroll
Secretary to the Planning Board

13

(3/20/25)

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="256">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="24512">
                <text>Planning Board Minutes &amp; Resolutions-2025</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24795">
              <text>MINS_PLAN_2025-03-20 Approved Planning Board Minutes</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24796">
              <text>Planning Board Minutes &amp; Resolutions-2025</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24797">
              <text>2025</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24798">
              <text>Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="24799">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
