<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<item xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" itemId="594" public="1" featured="0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/items/show/594?output=omeka-xml" accessDate="2026-09-19T08:57:44+00:00">
  <fileContainer>
    <file fileId="594">
      <src>https://sleepyhollow.localarchives.org/files/original/8f7208891f3987e910adb292253c1d61.pdf</src>
      <authentication>5c9118067735d7719f1a2197b4e0d7af</authentication>
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="4">
          <name>PDF Text</name>
          <description/>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="52">
              <name>Text</name>
              <description/>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="19082">
                  <text>to I

A Regular Meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Village of
North Tarrytown was held on March 5, 1991 at 8:00 PM.
Present:

Mayor Gandolfo
Trustee Treacy
Trustee Alter
Trustee Cicchetti
Trustee Rey
Trustee Hyland
Trustee Marren

Also Present:

William T. Regan, Village Administrator
John J. Hughes, Jr. Village Attorney

Mayor Gandolfo called the meeting to order with the pledge, to the
flag.
Public Hearings
Mayor Gandolfo stated that the first hearing was a continuation
of the new proposed "Ethics" code.
Mario Belanich recommended waiting for the new board before
approving the new Ethics Code.
There being no other comments from the public, Trustee Cicchetti
moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Trustee Alter and
motion carried 6-0.
Mayor Gandolfo stated that the next hearing was a continuation of
the proposed changes to Sections 57-6 and 57-7 of the Vehicle and
Traffic Law. The Mayor stated that since the last meeting, no
further correspondence has been received regarding this change.
There were no comments from the public, therefore Trustee Treacy
moved to close this public hearing, seconded by Trustee Alter and
motion carried 6-0.
Mayor Gandolfo stated that the next hearing regarding
abatement to seniors will be held after the hearing on
proposed amendments to the Wetlands/Watercourse ordinance.

tax
the

Mayor Gandolfo read the attached public hearing notice regarding
these proposed amendments.
She stated that letters received from Patricia Kringas, Donald
Stever, Turnquist Architects, Frederick P. Clark Associates, Inc.
and Sleepy Hollow Cemetery pertaining to these amendments will be
made part of the record.
Donald Stever, a member of the Conservation Advisory Council,
commented that the CAC was instrumental in bringing this
ordinance to the Board. He then addressed the Board with comments
on each of the proposed amendments to the wetlands ordinance.

1

�-

?

0

* -

Mr. Weiss, representing the Sleepy Hollow Cemetery, addressed the
Board stating that he did not object to all the amendments but
stated that the ordinance needed softening, otherwise many
problems will exist. The size of their stream in question is very
small and he felt that consideration should be given to size.
Patricia Kringas read her attached letter to the Board.
Steve Baderian, member of the Planning Board, stated that he felt
that destruction of a wetland is forever and cannot be reversed,
and delegating away the responsibility of the hard issues which
will be encountered under this ordinance is not a solution.
George O'Hanlon stated all sizes of wetlands need protection and
the ordinance should not be amended.
Mr. Goldhagen also felt the ordinance should not be amended.
Dr. Sweet, CAC Chairman, stated that years ago there were no
means to protect the wetlands; the Council proceeded to pursue it
and the Board of Trustees did pass this Wetlands ordinance. He
also felt that it should stand as is with no change.
Jim Donovan, of Frederick P. Clark, Associates, commented that
the reason for amendments were not only based on his review of
two applications before the Planning Board. He felt that a few
changes could be made without drastically changing the ordinance.
Some sections just need clarification, not changes; basis is
value not size, function of wetland determines its value. The
interpretation as it stands now, does not give anyone a chance to
build.
Trustees Cicchetti commented size or value is very difficult to
define and the Board should make judgment on each case but the
sole criteria should not be size.
Trustee Marren 's concern was establishing value which is very
difficult to define.
Mr. Galella questioned whether buildings which are already built
might have been denied if this ordinance was in effect.
The
Mayor stated it is very possible.
Mr. Belanich questioned how the definition of a wetland could be
amended. The Mayor commented that Mr. Donovan stated that we
should comply with the definition that the federal government
uses.
Donald Stever stated that after hearing Mr.
Donovan's
explanations for the amendments, there are certain concepts that
are acceptable but some language needs to be clarified.
Mr. Weiss commented that the size should not be an automatic
exception, but only if the Board deems feasible.
2

�803

Trustee Cicchetti stated that what the Board is trying to get
across is that the identification of size is not a necessary
factor, because regardless of size there are certain identifying
criteria which must be met.
Judith Washburn commented that one application before
Planning Board should not be the basis of these amendments.

the

Trustee Treacy moved to close the public hearing, seconded by
Trustee Alter and motion carried 6-0.
John Hughes, Village Attorney, stated that prior to any final
decision, the Board must comply with the State Environmental
Review Act and suggested that we first declare the Board as lead
agent, prepare an environmental assessment form, and prepare
resolutions which show that we have performed our obligations
under SEQR.
Brief discussion ensued.
Trustee Cicchetti stated that the
hearing helped to clarify many areas, especially the discussion
on size. Trustee Marren asked for a clarification on #4 and Mr.
Donovan stated the Planning Board must not only look at the
quality of the wetlands but also at the availability of alternate
sites and at mitigation. Given the wording in the current
ordinance there is not much chance of many permits being granted.
Mayor Gandolfo stated that questions have come up with regard to
this ordinance that need to be answered and that the amendments
are not soley for the purpose of the applications before the
Board at this time.
Trustee Cicchetti moved to declare the Board of Trustees as lead
agency and have Counsel prepare the environmental assessment form
which is required, seconded by Trustee Alter and motion carried.
The Mayor stated that before any decision is made everyone will
be notified.
The Mayor continued the public hearing on the proposed tax
abatement to rent controlled properties occupied by seniors..
Jim Tierney addressed the Board stating that he has checked
around and many villages already have this exemption and v/ould
like to Board to consider passing this resolution.
After a brief discussion, Trustee Cicchetti moved, seconded by
Trustee Alter to adopt a local law authorizing tax abatement to
rent controlled or rent regulated properties occupied by senior
citizens. More discussion ensued; Trustees Marren and Cicchetti
suggested that we wait and see what the impact would be. Mayor
Gandolfo commented that it is very difficult to determine the
impact until the seniors start applying. Trustee Marren moved to
table this discussion until the second meeting in April, seconded
by Trustee Cicchetti and motion carried with Trustee Treacy
voting No.
3

�I

Approval of Minutes
Trustee Treacy moved to approve the minutes of February 19, 1991,
seconded by Trustee Marren with the following corrections:
Trustee Treacy stated that on page 1, last paragraph should read
NYS Commission on Government Integrity not NYCOM, page 5, line 2,
Halpern Associates should be deleted and Trustee Marren stated
on page 4, first paragraph, last line financial should be added
to ad hoc committee; with those corrections motion carried with
Trustees Cicchetti, Alter and Hyland abstaining.
Trustee Rey moved to approve the minutes of the 79 College Avenue
Corporation meeting, seconded by Trustee Marren and motion
carried with Trustees Cicchetti, Alter and Hyland abstaining.
Approval of Warrants
Trustee Hyland moved to approve the warrants and authorize the
treasurer to pay the bills, seconded by Trustee Cicchetti. The
Deputy Treasurer commented that there were a few changes; payment
to Tappan Car Wash should be $125.50 and requested the Board to
approve reimbursement to the Senior Citizens for $4482.00, also
payment of $3160.64 to Radio Shack should be deleted; with those
changes motion was carried. Total for General Fund is $59,882.43
and Water Department Fund, $7895.02.
Communications, Petitions &amp; Requests
The Deputy Village Clerk was in receipt of a letter from Greene
County Importing Corp. informing us of their intent to renew
their NYS Grocery Store Beer License.
The Deputy Clerk received a call stating that Joseph Piedimonte
has resigned from the Senior Citizen Commission due to the fact
that he is in a nursing home. Trustee Hyland moved to accept his
resignation with regrets, seconded by Trustee Alter and motion
carried. She will send him a letter of thanks and certificate of
appreciation for all his years on the commission.
Communications,Petitions &amp; Requests
The Mayor received a letter from David Cappello, Second Assistant
Fire Chief; refer to Trustee Rey for his report.
Mayor Gandolfo was in receipt of a letter from Sandra Galef,
County Legislator, with regard to Paul Feiner's proposal to
construct a boat launching ramp at Kingsland Point Park. Will
discuss at work session.
Knapp-McCarthy has requested permission from the Board for his
taxi company to implement a twenty-five cents surcharge on taxi
rates. Refer to Police Committee.
Trustee Alter received
College Arms regarding
This will be referred
is a particular tenant

correspondence from several residents from
the inspection of steps, elevators, etc.
to the Building Inspector to see if there
who has a complaint.
4

�Trustee Treacy commented that he received a letter from Cable
regarding a public debate among the candidates.
Trustee Rey
stated that the candidates will appear on cable television on
March 11th from 8PM-10PM for a debate.
Public Comments
Armando Galella asked that the Board consider more handicapped
parking spaces on the business section of Beekman Avenue. Trustee
Treacy suggested referring this to the Handicapped Committee.
Eileen Meade commented that at a meeting with Hugh Jones, he told
the Commission that there was an agreement with the Village to
dump at Devries Field. The Mayor stated that this is not true and
no agreement was ever made with him; Village Counsel will send a
letter to him regarding this.
Mrs. Meade asked where the $12,000. which GM donated was applied.
Mayor Gandolfo stated that it was used to level and grade the
field. Mrs. Meade asked why flatbed trucks were at the field and
when the debris will be removed. The Administrator stated that
Metro North has a right of way and have been granted access for a
day or more for their trailers. Most of the debris has been
removed and all will be gone by the time Little League starts. If
the hay is not removed, we can use it.
There being no further comments, the Mayor closed the public
comment section.
Mayor's Report
Mayor Gandolfo received a call from Mayor Pilla of Tarrytown
suggesting that the two villages sponsor a joint home coming
celebration for those residents who are presently serving in the
Gulf. We would like to set up a Citizens' Committee to organize
the event.
Trustee Marren suggested that the Street Festival
might be a good time to have this.
Mayor Gandolfo stated that Jeffrey Garrant of North Tarrytown is
presently serving in the Air Force. She asked for anyone's help
in getting the names of any other local residents serving there.
On April 2 0th the North Tarrytown Alumni Association will be
dedicating a tree in front of Village Hail in memory of Thomas
Cavalieri, a former trustee and graduate of North Tarrytown. For
further information, contact Fannie Stone or Mario DeFelice.
Sgt. Ferguson requested that the Mayor announce that police
departments from both Villages in conjunction with the public and
parochial schools invite all village officials to attend
graduation for D.A.R.E students to be held on March 6th at 8 PM
at the Sleepy Hollow High School auditorium.
A nearing will be held on Wednesday at 8 PM regarding a personnel
matter.
Administrator's Report
The Administrator reported that the sodium silicate bids will be
opened on March 14th.
5

�%El}

Russell Chevrolet bid is being recommended for award on tonight's
agenda.
He and Sanjay Shah will be going to Garden City this Thursday to
look at the CompuCourt system.
A representative from the UDC may be here this Thursday to look
at the Van Tassel storefronts and we should know by April 21st
whether we will receive the grant.
Trustees' Report
Trustee Treacy reported that the Board iu waiting for PBA to file
for arbitration and the Municipal Employees Unit must file for
mediation.
Trustee Treacy asked why our recycling program has not been
successful. Trustee Hyland responded that certain items such as
building materials are being picked up but should not.
Trustee Alter reported that the fencing for Devries Field is due
to come in this week. He also reported on events in the
Recreation Department/men's spring softball league organizational
meeting will be held on Wednesday, March 6th at 7 PM, Easter Egg
hunt will be held on Saturday, March 30th 10 AM in Douglas Park,
sure shot basketball will be held on Saturday, March 30th and a
girl's softball program is being organized.
Trustee Cicchetti stated that by March 31 there must be a review
and preliminary alteration of the tentative budget by the Board
of Trustees, therefore the Mayor must present the budget by March
2 0th. He suggested that the Finance Committee meet on March 22,
and the whole Board meet on the 25th or 27th to review the
budget. It was decided to meet on Monday, March 25th.
Trustee Cicchetti commented that we are starting out in real
trouble with the cuts in revenue sharing and state aid.
Trustee Rey reported that he has contacted Mr. Moulton of Moulton
Insurance Company regarding his fee and stated that if we used in
house personnel, perhaps we could save the $5000.
The Mayor stated that although this was quite commendable to try
and save money, we must look at the success or failure of the
program and whether or not we have the personnel in house to do
this. Discussion ensued on the feasibility of this change.
Trustee cicchetti commented that he would like take this up at
the budget session.
Trustee Hyland entered the Police Report into the record.
Trustee Marren gave an update on the Group Home; she put in a
call to the State to try to push the issue, but she did not have
much success and will try again. The problem is that there is
nothing in writing at this point.
Old Business
Trustee Rey asked about light on County House Road;
Administrator stated that it will be working this weekc
6

the

�Trustee Cicchetti asked about the appointments to the ARB. Mayor
Gandolfo appointed Marion Reilly of 14 Lakeview Avenue and Brian
Slavin of 4 0 Bedford Road to the Architectural Review Board.
Trustee Treacy recommended Chris Skelly, Susan Galgano and Phil
Keimig to be appointed to the Ethics Board.
New Business
The next work session will be March 12, Election Day is March 19,
a meeting to accept the results will be held on March 20th and
the next board meeting will be held on March 26th.
Resolutions-Attached
Much discussion ensued among the Trustees on the new ethics code,
specifically whether or not to delete #3 on page 4 which dealt
with whether or not a compensated employee could be a party
chairman,etc. After much discussion Trustee Marren moved that #3
on page 4 of the ethics code be deleted, seconded by Trustee Rey
and motion carried 4-2 with Trustees Hyland, Alter, Rey and
Marren voting Yes and Trustees Treacy and Cicchetti voting No.
The Mayor stated for the record, she read in the newspaper that
Trustee Hyland approved of the code as written.
Resolution #3/38/91:
Trustee Treacy moved to adopt the new
Ethics Code with the changes made at the work session and the
deletion of #3 on page 4, second by Trustee Cicchetti and motion
carried 6-1,with Mayor Gandolfo, Trustees Treacy, Alter, Hyland,
Cicchetti and Marren voting Yes and Trustee Rey voting No.
Executive Session
Trustee Marren moved to adjourn to executive session to discuss
personnel matter, second by Trustee Cicchetti and motion carried.
Discussion ensued regarding the disciplinary hearing for a police
officer.
There being no further business, the Mayor adjourned the meeting.
Respectfully submitted,

Angela Everett
Deputy Village Clerk

7

�n

PUBLIC HEARING
VILLAGE OF NORTH TARRYTOWN
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the Board of Trustees of the Village
of North Tarrytown will hold a Public Hearing on Tuesday, March
5, 1991 at 8:00 PM at Village Hall, ,28 Beekman Avenue, North
Tarrytown, New York to hear and consider various proposed
amendments to the Wetlands/Watercourse Ordinance, as follows:
(1

To amend the definition of "Agricultural Activity"
found at Section 61.5 of the Ordinance;

(2

To amend the definition of "Wetland" also found at
Section 61.5 of the Ordinance;

(3

To provide watercourses with a buffer area, as
described in Section 61.5;

(4

To modify Section 61-12. A(.7) requiring the selection
of preferable alternative location for a proposed
activity;

(5

To provide flexibility in the types of mitigation
required by Section 61.13. A;

(6

To revise the regulation of smaller wetlands.

All taxpayers, residents and parties in interest are invited
to attend and be heard at this public hearing.
By Order of the Board of Trustees
February 27, 1991
William T. Regan
Village Clerk

�Meeting Date: 3/5/91
Resolution #: 3/34/91
Be It Resolved the Board of Trustees awards the contract for a
new "Latest Model 4 Wheel Drive Vehicle" to Russell Chevrolet,
985 Post Road, Fairfield, Conn, as lowest bidder for the sum of
$19,540.
MOVED: Trustee Hyland

SECONDED: "Trustee Cicchetti

VOTE :

6-0

Meeting Date:3/5/91
Resolution #: 3/35/91
Be It Resolved, that the Board of Trustees hereby endorses the
use of Housing Implementation Fund monies to offset the infrastructure costs for the ARCH (Affordable River Community Housing) Immaculate Conception Affordable Housing Program; and
Hereby states that the project known as the ARCH Immaculate Conception Housing Program will assist the Village of North Tarrytown in achieving its housing policy and goal to provide affordable housing; and
Hereby states that the housing component of the project known as
the Immaculate Conception cannot be achieved without the provision of the aforesaid infrastructure improvements; and
Hereby request that the County of Westchester award a Housing Implementation Fund Grant to the Village of North Tarrytown in the
a m o u n t of $147,000.00 for the project known as the
ARCH/Immaculate Conception; and
Be it further resolved, the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute
such an agreement on behalf of the Village of North Tarrytown,
subject to the review of the Village Attorney.
MOVED: Trustee Marren

SECONDED: Trustee Alter

VOTE: 6-0

�Meeting Date: 3/5/91
Resolution #: 3/36/91
RESOLVED:
1.

The Board of Trustees of the Village of North Tarrytown

("The Board") hereby declares itself as lead agent to consider the
environmental effects of the establishment of a small yard waste
compost site to be operated by the Village according to all state
operational guidelines and permit conditions.

This site is to be

located at Phelps Hospital, Route 9, North Tarrytown, New York.
2.

The Board has examined an Environmental Assessment form

prepared by John J. Hughes, Jr., Village Counsel.
3.

The action as above

described

is an unlisted

action

pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law and
Part 617 of the Rules and Regulations promulgated thereunder, and
will, in and of itself, not have

a significant effect on

the

environment, so that no Environmental Impact Statement is required
or need be filled therefor.
4.

Nothing herein contained, however, shall be deemed to

indicate or suggest that subsequent submissions for development of
the

property

will

not

require

the

preparation

and

filing

of

Environmental Impact Statements .
5.

This

resolution

is

a

Negative

Declaration

for

the

purposes of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, Local
Law Environmental Quality Review Act for the Village of North
Tarrytown, and will be kept on file at the Village Hall and be
available for public examination.

MOVED:

Trustee Rey

SECONDED: Trustee Marren

VOTE: 6"°

�Sf/

SEQR
617.21
Appendix F
State Environmental Quality Review
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Notice of Determination of Non-Significance
Project Number

Date F e b r u a r y 1 3 , 199

This notice Is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the Implementing regulations pertaining to Article
8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law.
The Village of North Tarrytown
t a g | e a c j agency,
has determined that the proposed action described below will not have a significant effect on the
environment and a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will not be prepared.

Name of Action:

SEQR Status: Type I
Unlisted

O
E)

Gonu'iiioiied Negative Deciarfltiers:

ED**'"**
El No

^

Description of Action:
Placing leaves to create mulch by natural process (composting).
Recycling leaves into topsoil, thereby preventing burning.

Location: (Include street address and the name of the municipality/county. A location map of appropriate
scale Is also recommended.)
Route 9 (Broadway)
North Tarrytown, New York 10591

�I

6\2

I

SEQR Negative Declaration

Page 2

Reasons Supporting This Determination:
(See 617.6(g) for requirements of this determination; see 617.6(h) for Conditioned Negative Declaration)

The Village of North Tarrytown, acting as lead agency to consider the
environmental effect of the above referenced action, has determined
that the proposed action will not result in any significant adverse
environmental impact.
The significance determination is made in accordance with Section 617.'11
and Section 617.6(g) - State Environmental Quality Review Act.

I
If Conditioned Negative Oaclaratlon, provide or. attachment the specifkrmWgatJon measures Imposed.
For Further information:

Contact Person:
Address:

William Regan, V i l l a g e A d m i n i s t r a t o r

V i l l a g e H a l l , 2 8 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York

Telephone Number:

(914)

631-0533

For Type i Actions and Conditioned Negative Declarations, a Copy of this Notice Sent-to:
Commissioner, Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233-00(
Appropriate Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Conservation
Office of the Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision In which the action will be principall
located.
Applicant (if any)
Other involved agencies (if any)

�Meeting Date: 3/5/91
Resolution #: 3/37/91
Be It Resolved, the Board of Trustees schedules a Public Hearing
for Tuesday, March 26, 1991 to consider amending the New York
State Emergency Tenant Protection Act of 19 74, Chapter 567 - Laws
of 1974 to apply only to those residential rental properties
within the Village of North Tarrytown that contain 10 or more
rental units.
MOVED : Trustee Marrpn

SECONDED: Trustee Rey

VOTE :

6-0

�TELEPHONE
(914) 631-0800

Gabriel Hayes, Jr.
Provisional Chief of Police

Police lejrartment
tillage of Nartlj (Harrgtamn, #.*}. 10531
POLICE REPORT

FEBRUARY

1991

Total Number Charged by Police:
1. Arrested
2. Summonsed

159
1268

Total

1427

Persons Charged with Crimes or Violations:

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.

V&amp;T Moving Violations
132
V&amp;T Non Moving Violations
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
4
Burg 2nd-Poss Burg Tools-Attempt Assault-Crim Mischief!!!."!!!!!!!!
1
Criminal Mischief 4th
2
Reckless Endangerment-Crim Poss Weapon 4th
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Grand Larceny 4th
[[[
NT Warrant Grand Larceny 4th
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !
NT Warrant Publ ic Lewedness
!..!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NT Warrant Robery 2nd~Assault 2nd-Resisting arrest!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Criminal Contempt 2nd-Assault 3rd
Criminal Mischief 3rd-Unauthorized Use of a Motor Vehicle...!!!!!!
Criminal Possession Controlled Substance 7th
NT Warrant Aggravated Harassment
Harassment
159
Unlawful Poss of Marihuana
!!!!!!!!!!! Total
D.W.I
'..'.'.*'.'.*
8

�/AT

Parking Violations:
1. M e t e r e d P a r k i n g
2. Other Parking Violations..

920
348
Total

Investigations of
Investigations of
Investigations of
Aiding of Injured

1268

Reported Felonies
Other Complaints
Auto Accidents
at Accidents

7
300
y\
4
Total

Police Aid to Sick Persons
Ambulance Requests
Responding to Alarms
Arrests on Warrants
Missing Persons
D.O.A
Escorts
Checking
11 Dark Houses
Other Calls for Assistance

332

•••
••••

14
14
15

&gt; . •

4
••

•.
0.......0

0
0
..»..
6
122
229
Total
404

Respectfully Submitted,

Lt. Gabriel

Hayes '

Provisional Chief of Police

•

�TELEPHONE

^&amp;jffi?W

(914) 631-0800

^^SMO^

Gabriel Hayes. Jr.

Provisional Chief of Police

Paltce department
19illagc uf Norti| ®arrgi0imi. 2f.||. 10591

THE FOLLOWING LISTS THE LOCATION OF ALARMS AND THE NUMBER OF TIMES
RESPONDED TO BY THE OFFICERS OF THIS DEPARTMENT DURING THE MONTH OF
FEBRUARY 1991

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

14 Evergreen Way
457 Bel lwood Ave
265 Harwood Ave
126 Valley St
Frank Chevrolet
Xerox 141 Weber Ave
Brostoff Buick Cadillac
377 No Broadway Gas Post Inc.
20 Hemlock Dr
SH Restoration
,
Amenta Travel 239 No Broadway
56 Fremont Rd

2
1
2
1
2
1
1
1
1
1
1
1

�Patricia Kringas
Peter Kringas
Demetrios Kringas
149 I'tebber Avenue
Mo. Tarry town N.Y. 10591
March 5, 1991
Dear Mayor Gandolfo and The Village Board of Trustees,
The Wetlands/Watercourse ordinance in concept is very valuable to a
community. Kyself and my family support environmental protection,however
this local law for wetland/watercourse protection is much too RESTRICTIVE.
In particular the small property owner who has paid taxes on property for
more than 30 years in hopes of subdividing a lot is greatly penalized by
the restrictive language in the law.
The law does not take into consideration the character of the land versus
a common PUDDLE. When you apply this law to someones front lawn or to a major
track of farm land or open fields the character is considerably different.
This ordinance has only one standard and is extremely rigid in its application.
In the case of the small property owner, a small plot of land that is within
the 100 ft. of a wetland this area needs to be evaluated in terms of the
following criteria:
a) Does it serve an educational value?
b) Are their endangered species threatened?
c) Is there

aesthetic value to the wetland?

d) Does the land serve a wetland function?
The mitigation clause calls for a 2:1 replacement. No other state has such
a strict ordinance. The State Of New Jersey just passed a 1:1 replacement
recently and according to experts this is viewed as restrictive.
This law has no room for variances at all. More specifically;
a) There is no time requirement on land ownership.
b) There is no hardship clause.
c) There is no wetland analysis exemption clause.
d) There is no consideration of the tax payer constitutional
right to develop property that he has paid HIGH TAXES
on for multiple years.

�Wetlands/page 2
Kringas letter
. March 5, 1991
Finally, This ordinance is inconsistent with zoning requirements. If
the zoning requirements are a 5000 sq. ft. minimums for a building lot then
the 100 ft. setback requirement of the wetland law , makes it impossible to
develop small property.
My appeal is to the Mayor and the Board to consider some revisions in
our local wetlands law. The revisions that I have suggested are consistent
with federal guidelines and other neighboring communities laws.
Thank you for your consideration of this request.
Respectful ly,
Patricia Kringas

Peter D. Kringas
Demetrios P. Kri

O

�/7

SIDLEY

&lt;3c

AUSTIN

A PARTNERSHIP INCLUDING PROFESSIONAL CORPORATIONS
ONE P1HST NATIONAL PLAZA
CHICAOO, ILLINOIS 6 O 6 O 0
012: S S O - 7 0 0 0
PAX: 0 1 2 - 6 5 0 - 7 0 1 8
SO 4 © CENTURY PARK EAST
LOS ANOELES, CALlrOHNIA 9 O O 0 7
BIO: 0 0 0 - 6 1 0 O
PAX: 8 1 0 - 0 3 6 - S 6 4 4
17EB EYE STREET, N.W.
WASHINOTON, D.C. B 0 0 0 6
BOS: 4 B 9 - 4 0 0 0
fAX 1 BOB • 4 8 9 - 6 1 4 4

8 75 THIRD AVENUE

N E W YORK, N E W Y O R K 1 0 0 2 S
T E L E P H O N E 212: 4 1 8 - 2 1 0 0
T E L E X 97-16 9 6
F A C S I M I L E 212: 4 1 8 - 2 1 6 5

10 KINO WILLIAM STREET
LONDON, EC4N 7 S A , ENGLAND
441: 681-1618 FAX: A 4 l - 0 e e - 7 B O 7
0 SHENTON WAY
S1NOAPORE 0 1 0 6
68: 8 2 4 - 3 0 0 0
PAX: S 0 • 0 £ 4 • 0 0 O O

HASH1DATE LAW OFFICE
IMPERIAL TOWER, 7TH PX.OOR
1-1, UCII1SAIWAICHO 1-CHOMB
CHIYODA'XU, TOKYO lOO JAPAN
O 0 - 0 O 4 - 0 6 O O FAX: 0 0 - 0 0 4 - 1 0 0 9

December 21, 1990
Hon. Janet Gandolfo, Mayor
Village of North Tarrytown
28 Beekman Street
North Tarrytown, N.Y. 10591
•^-(^

Re:

Wetland/Watercourse Protection Law

Dear Janet:
I have received a copy of a letter sent to you by Jim Donovan of
Frederick P. Clark Associates, in which he suggests certain
revisions to the Wetland/Watercourse Protection Law ("the Law").
Since this law had its origin in the Conservation Advisory
Committee, of which I am a member, I am taking the liberty to
provide you, and by the copy to John Hughes, to the Village
Attorney, with my comments on the suggested amendments.
As a threshold matter, since the Law had its origin in model
local legislation produced by the Westchester County Soil and
Water Conservation District, and in particular Laura Tessier, its
staff director, who is a well-regarded wetland expert, I have
taken the liberty of sending a copy of this letter and the F.P.
Clark letter to Ms. Tessier, and have solicited her reaction,
I have had over fifteen years of experience in wetland regulatory
matters, including having represented EPA and the Army Corps of
Engineers in the later 1970s and early 1980s, while the federal
wetlands program was being developed, and I will try to bring
some of that experience to bear on the matters suggested by Clark
Associates.
Definition of Wetland. Clark suggests simplifying the
definition of wetland to "reflect the general wording
of the federal government", indicating that such a
change was recently suggested by the County Soil and
Water Conservation District. Although I have no
particular quarrel with doing that, you should know
that one reason the definition is as detailed as it is
relates to a desire to avoid uncertainty and to limit
local costs. The federal definition requires numerous
judgment calls, which must be made at each site by

�I

AUSTIN

N E W YORK

experts. Such judgment calls can be expensive and are
subject to challenge. Although the current language is
far from perfect, it has the one significant advantage
of clarity and certainty of application.
Wetland/Watercourse Buffer.
suggestion.

I agree with Clark's

Minimum Wetland Size. I disagree entirely with this
suggestion. First, an arbitrary size limitation is
inconsistent with the generally-held notion that even a
very small wetland can be very important in the right
location. For North Tarrytown, moreover, 1/10 acre is
too large a threshold. For example, recently an
applicant before the Planning Board proposed to destroy
a very small, but very unique wetland area, and has
been (or will have to be) told to consider alternatives
which are available to it. Although probably larger
than 1/10 acre, this is still small. The federal law
contains no jurisdictional thresholds, and the Corps of
Engineers regulatory program employs a convenience
threshold of ten acres for freshwater wetlands, which
(1) assumes that local regulation will fill the gap and
(2) which is subject to withdrawal in individual
projects.
Animal Grazing.

The suggestion by Clark makes sense.

Necessary and Unavoidable Impacts. I also disagree
with this suggestion, which cuts to the heart of the
protectiveness of this law. A similar issue was raised
several years ago in connection with §404 of the
Federal Water Pollution Control Act, with EPA, and
ultimately the federal courts, concluding that if these
laws are to work, offsite, as well as onsite
alternatives must be considered relevant. In the case
that established this principal, the developer
conveniently bought a parcel that was mostly wetland,
because it was cheap. He did not buy a nearby parcel
that did not have wetlands that would have served
equally well for his shopping center. It was, at the
time of the relevant litigation, owned by another
developer who had no intention of selling. The court
concluded that if the activity could be done as well on
an upland area, the impacts were neither necessary nor
unavoidable. By rewording the Law to limit alternative
site consideration only to sites owned by the applicant
at the time virtually creates a loophole that creative
land assembly will be able to exploit.
I do, however, agree that non-wetland environmental
impacts associated with development on upland sites
should be considered, and thus would support amending
the Law to factor this consideration into the
alternatives analysis.

�SIDLEY

&lt;Sc

N E W YORK

AUSTIN

Mandatory Mitigation. This comment by Clark seems
cynical to me. The federa-1 wetland program, which
historically did not require mandatory mitigation, has
been altered within the last two years to require
mandatory mitigation. That change was premised on the
realization that otherwise no meaningful mitigation
would occur. The two-for-one replacement formula
recognizes that man-made ecosystems are generally
inferior to natural systems, and thus if you destroy a
natural system a greater area of artificial wetland
needs to be created as a replacement.
The whole point of these laws is to reverse the trend
of destroying these important areas because they were
cheap to buy. If you eliminate mandatory mitigation,
you eliminate the disincentive.
Wetland Buffer Replacement.
position on this point.
Watercourse Replacement.
on this point.

1" agree with Clark's

I agree with Clark's position

I would be happy to discuss these matters with the
Board, should it wish to receive my views.
f

Very truSLy ,-yrmrs

Donald W. Stever
cc:

John Hughes, Esq.
Laura Tessier
CAC Chair

�TURNQUIST
ARCHITECTS
95 BEEKMAN AVE
NORTH TARRYTOWN
NEW YORK 10591
TEL 914-631-9107

March 4, 1991
The Honorable Janet Gandolfo, Mayor
&amp; the Board of Trustees, Village of North Tarrytown
2 8 Beekman Avenue
North Tarrytown, New York 10591
Re: Local Law for Wetland/Watercourse Protection
Dear Mayor and Trustees:
This letter is intended to describe the dilemma of two of my
clients who want to build 1 family houses in the Village of North
Tarrytown.
The first client has requested consideration by the Village of
North Tarrytown Planning Board for a subdivision on Webber Avenue.
The owner wishes to subdivide a parcel and create 2 conforming
lots on which he would build houses for his son and daughter.
The project appeared to be acceptable to the Planning Board until
the Village Planning Consultant pointed out that the parcels were
within 100 feet of a watercourse. This watercourse, it was
suggested, may run under the owners present lawn area. A surface
investigation by this office (during all seasons) and the description of soil encountered by the owner when creating the lawn
suggested that if there is any movement of water, it must be well
below the present grade. This type of watercourse movement is
common along the Hudson River Valley, especially during the spring
thaw. Water penetrates the surface soils and reaches the substrata
of rock and flows from the high points of the Village down to the
Hudson River.
The owner is now confronted with the additional cost of determining
the possible existence of a watercourse and whether or not the
property falls under the Wetland/Watercourse Protection Law.
The second client subdivided a parcel on Tappan Avenue some 3 years
ago. The subdivision created 2 conforming lots. At that time the
owner was unable financially to construct the 2 one family
residences, one of which he had intended to live in. Recently the
client has directed this office to prepare construction documents

�The Honorable Janet Gandolfo, Mayor
&amp; the Board of Trustees, Village of North Tarrytown
March 4, 1991
page 2 for the 2 houses. Consulting with the Building Inspector, he
pointed out that the 2 parcels in question are within 100 feet
of the Pocantico River and they would fall under the Wetland/
Watercourse Protection Law. The lots appear to be entirely
clear of any wetlands and/or watercourse and would not in any
way affect same. The future of these parcels are in question.
To summarize, these 2 clients over the years have planned to
build a home for themselves and/or their relatives. Thinking
that they had buildable lots, these people have discovered that
there is a very good chance that they cannot build and that the
parcels are basically worthless.
Reviewing the present "Local Law for Wetland/Watercourse
Protection", this office feels that this law is too restrictive;
there is no room for individual variances; there is no consideration for hardship and if required, the "Mitigation Policy" as
described by a ratio of 2:1 is unusually strict. The Law has
good intentions and would limit large scale projects (as it should)
but unfairly penalizes the small individual property owner.
Having heard some of the recommendations of the Village Planning
Consultant, this office urges the Mayor and the Board to consider
them and revise this very restrictive law. We are all in favor
of protecting our Wetlands and Watercourses and these modifications
will not realistically affect our natural resources.
Thank you for your interest.
Yours truly,

tonald
T u r n q u i s t , R.A.
TURNQUIST ARCHITECTS

�FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning/Development /Environment /Transportation
Rye, New York and Southport, Connecticut

David J. Portman, AICP
Frederick E. Wiedle, AICP
Howard I. Reynolds, PE
David H. Stolman, AICP

350 Theodore Fremd Avenue
Rye, New York 10580
(914)967-6540
FAX (914) 967-6615

Michael A. Galante
Joanne P. Meder, AICP
Jim Donovan, RLA, ASLA

February 26, 1991

Mayor Janet Gandolfo and Members of the
Village Board of Trustees
Village of North Tarrytown
Village Hall
2 8 Beekman Avenue
North Tarrytown, New York 10591
Subject:

Revisions to the Village's Wetland/Watercourse
Protection Law

Dear Mayor Gandolfo and Members of the Village Board:
In a previous letter to you, we outlined suggested revisions to the
existing Village Wetland Law. The revisions were meant to make the
Law easier to administer, and more equitable to Village residents.
As requested by the Village Board, we have drafted exact changes to
the Law based on our earlier recommendations. These proposed text
changes take into account outside comments already received by the
Village on our suggestions.
Our proposed text changes, which are identified with proposed
additions underlined and proposed deletions in brackets, are as
follows.
1.

To eliminate the discrepancy about grazing horses, modify
Section 61-5. AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITY as follows:
The activity of an individual farmer or other landowner
in grazing and watering livestock that directly produce
agricultural products? making reasonable use of water
resources for agricultural purposes; harvesting the
natural products of wetlands, excluding peat mining and
timber harvesting; and selective cutting of trees,
filling or selective cutting of trees.
"Agricultural
activity" does not mean clear-cutting trees; filling or
deposition of spoil; mining; grazing of horses for nonagricultural
purposes
or
draining
for
growing
agricultural products or for other purposes.

�^r

FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation

Mayor Janet Gandolfo
Page 2
February 26, 1991
2.

To shorten the definition of Wetland, and to reference the
Federal definition, delete Section 61-5. WETLAND/FRESHWATER
WETLAND Subsection B. and substitute the following text:
B.

All areas that comprise hvdric soils and are inundated or
saturated bv surface or ground water at a frequency and
duration sufficient to support, and under normal
circumstances do support, a prevalence of hvdrophytic
vegetation as defined bv the Federal Interagency
Committee for Wetland Delineation. 1989. Federal Manual
for Identifying and Delineating Jurisdictional Wetlands.
US Army Corps of Engineers, US Environmental Protection
Agency, US Fish and Wildlife Service, and USDA Soil
Conservation Service, Washington, DC.
Cooperative
Technical Publication.

(Note: Four pages of wetland definition will be deleted by this
modification.)
As part of this modification, the following definitions in Section
61-5 can also be deleted:

3.

DOMINANTS or DOMINANCE
FACULTATIVE SPECIES
FERROUS IRON
GROWING SEASON
HISTOSALS/ORGANIC SOILS
LONG DURATION
MINERAL SOIL
MUNSELL COIL COLOR CHARTS
OBLIGATE UPLAND SPECIES
VERY LONG DURATION
WATER TABLE
WETLAND HYDROLOGY
WETLAND PLANTS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, 19 8 6
To provide watercourses with a buffer, modify Section 61-5.
WETLAND/WATERCOURSE BUFFER as follows:
The "wetland/watercourse buffer" is a specified area
surrounding a wetland or watercourse that is intended to
provide some degree of protection to the wetland or
watercourse from human activity and other encroachment
associated with development. The "wetland/watercourse
buffer" shall be subject to the regulations for wetlands
as defined in this local law and shall be determined to
be the area extending one hundred (100) feet horizontally

�FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation

Mayor Janet Gandolfo
Page 3
February 26, 1991
away from and paralleling the wetland boundary or
watercourse edge or greater than one hundred (100) feet
where designated by either the Commissioner of the
Department of Environmental Conservation or the local
approval authority.
4.

To not penalize Village residents who have owned land for a
long time, modify Section. 61-12.A. (7) as follows:
The availability of preferable alternative locations on
the subject parcel or, in the case of an activity which
cannot be undertaken on the property without disturbance
to wetland/watercourse, the availability
of other
reasonable locations for the activity that could be
obtained, used, expanded, or managed at any time during
the proposed activities planning history, whether or not
such locations are now under the ownership or control of
the applicant.
Additionally, modify Section 61-12.D.(3) as follows:
There is no feasible alternative to the proposed activity
on any other site that could be obtained, used, expanded
or managed at anv time during the proposed activities
planning history that is not a wetland/watercourse or
wetland/watercourse buffer.

5.

To provide more flexibility in the types of
required, modify Section 61-13.A. as follows:
A.

mitigation

After it has been determined by the Planning Board
pursuant to § 61-12D that losses of wetland/watercourse
or buffers are necessary and unavoidable and have been
minimized to the maximum extent practicable, the
applicant shall develop a mitigation plan which shall
specify mitigation measures that provide for mitigation
as follows:
(1)

For losses to wetlands: replacement wetlands or
enhancement or restoration of existing wetlands
[/watercourses] that recreate as nearly as possible
the original wetlands[/watercourses] in terms of
type, functions, geographic location and setting
and that are larger than, by a ratio of two to one
(2:1),
the
original
wetlands[/watercourses],
provided the ecological impacts associated with the

�FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning /Development/Environment/Transportation

Mayor Janet Gandolfo
Page 4
February 26, 1991
mitigation are not greater than those associated
with the proposed activity;
(2)

For
losses
to
watercourses:
replacement,
enhancement or restoration of the watercourse that
recreates as nearly as possible the disturbed or
lost portion of the original watercourse in terms
of type, function, geographic location and setting,
bv a ratio of one to one for the disturbed or lost
portion of the watercourse or the preparation of
other mitigation plans acceptable to the approving
authority that serves to replace or enhance the
functions of the watercourse affected bv the
proposed activity; and

(3)

For losses to wetland buffers;
enhancement of
existing wetland
buffers. or enhancement
or
restoration of existing wetlands by a ratio of two
to one for the area disturbed bv the proposed
activity that replace or enhance the functions of
the wetland or wetland buffer.

For
the
purposes
of
mitigation,
losses
of
wetland/watercourse buffers will be viewed as losses of
wetland.
On-site mitigation shall be the preferred
approach, off-site mitigation shall be permitted only in
cases where an on-site alternative is not possible.
6.

To revise the regulation of smaller wetlands, the Sleepy
Hollow Cemetery has suggested an addition of another
subsection to Section 61-12. This addition should be
considered if the Board feels that it would like to consider
any sort of limiting of the regulations for smaller wetland
areas. The wording of the Sleepy Hollow Cemetery proposal,
with our suggested modifications, is a follows:
61-12 E. Waiver.
If the area of a wetland/watercourse for which there has
been an application for a permit is one-tenth of an acre
or less, the Planning Board shall be empowered, upon such
conditions as it may deem appropriate, to waive any of
the provisions of Section 61-12 and 61-13 of this local
law in issuing such permit.

7.

To clarify potential discrepancies within the law as to the
delineation of wetlands, modify Section 61-3.B. as follows:

�FREDERICK P. CLARK ASSOCIATES, INC.
Planning/Development/Environment/Transportation

Mayor Janet Gandolfo
Page 5
February 26, 1991
Rules
for
establishing
and
interpreting
wetland/watercourse boundaries.
The boundaries of a
wetland/watercourse ordinarily shall be determined by
field investigation [,] and flagging [and] with a
subsequent survey by a licensed land surveyor unless the
last is waived by the North Tarrytown Planning Board.
The North Tarrytown Planning Board may consult and/or may
require the applicant to consult with biologists,
hydrologists, soil scientists, ecologists/botanists or
other experts as necessary to make this determination
pursuant to the definition criteria contained in § 61-5.
Additionally, modify Section 61-10.A.(6)(a) as follows:
(a)

The location of all wetlands/watercourses as
determined
by
a
qualified
ecologist/botanist
[and/or]j_ soil scientist and/or other qualified
experts no earlier than twelve (12) months prior to
the date of filing the application.

If you have any questions on our proposed text, please let us know.
We are planning to attend the Village Board's upcoming public
hearing to more fully explain the proposed revisions to both you
and the public.
We have taken the liberty of forwarding a copy of these proposed
revisions to anyone who commented on our earlier suggestions.
Sincerely,

cc:

William Regan
Planning Board
John Hughes, Jr.
Building Inspector
Planning Board Secretary
Donald Stever
Laura Tessier
Sleepy Hollow Cemetery
Thomas Gissen

500\not1-003.Jdjev

I

�xtf

at Gternjiaam
ORGANIZED
A

MEMBERSHIP

IN

1S49

CORPORATION

TELEPHONE
MEDFORD

1-0O8I
NORTH TARRYTOWN.

N.Y.

10SB1

February 15, 1991
Mayor Janet Gandoifo
Village Hall
28 Beekman Avenue
North Tarrytown, NY 10591
SUBJECT:

Amendment to the Village's Wetland-Watercourse
Protection Law

Dear Mayor Gandoifo:
We again thank you and the members of the Board of
Trustees for giving us the opportunity to be heard last
Tuesday with regard to the questions which have been raised
in connection with the application of Sleepy Hollow Cemetery
for a permit pursuant to the provisions of Local Law, No. 1,
of 1990 relating to Wetland/Watercourse Protection.
In accordance with Section 61-22 B of the Wetland/Watercourse Law we request an amendment to the Law to add the
following:
"(Section) 61-12 E. Waiver.
If the area of a wetland/watercourse for which there has
been an application for a permit is one-tenth of an acre
or less, the Planning Board shall be empowered, upon such
conditions as it may deem appropriate, to waive any of the
provisions of this local law in issuing such permit."
We submit that adoption of this amendment will enable the
Planning Board to act favorably upon the pending application
of Sleepy Hollow Cemetery. We hope and understand that the
Board of Trustees will hold the required public hearing at the
earliest possible date, and we thank you in anticipation of that
action.

CC:
John J , Hughes, J r . , E s q .

RespeotTul'ly submitted,
SleenyJlaUow -(•^me'cery
/&gt;
r
by
flVyfU.^
&gt;/ /LC&lt;&lt;-i-c,a-£;VL—-&gt;
President

�Westchester County
SOIL AND WATER
CONSERVATION DISTRICT
ANDREW P. O'ROURKE
County Executive
CAROL COGGESHALL
Chairperson
LAURA E TESSIER
District Manager

March 21, 1991

Mayor Janet Gandolfo and Members of the
Village Board of Trustees
Village of North Tarrytown
Village Hall
28 Beekman Avenue
North Tarrytown, NY 10591
Re:

Clark Associates Letter of 2/26/91
re Revisions to the Village's Wetland/Watercourse Protection Law

Dear Mayor Gandolfo and Members of the Village Board:
The District has received a copy of the above captioned letter, and as
follow up, would like to comment on proposed revision #6 (page 4 of the
Clark letter).
This item incorporates a waiver for the regulation of wetlands one-tenth of an acre or less in size (4,356 sf) by the Planning Board
"... upon such conditions as it may deem appropriate...." Our comments regarding the advisability of establishing arbitrary thresholds (District
letter to Donald Stever dated 12/31/90) stand; however, should the Board decide to adopt this waiver provision, we strongly recommend that standard
criteria for the granting of waivers be specified in the text of the ordinance to remove the potential for arbitrary decision-making.
Thank you for considering our comments.
If the District can be of further assistance to the Village, please do not hesitate to contact our office .

Sincerely,

Laura E. Tessier
District Manager
cc:

James Donovan, F.P. Clark Associates
Donald Stever, Esq.
214 Central Avenue • White Plains, N.Y 10606 • 914 682-3080

�Janet Gandolfo, Mayor
William T. Regan
Administrator

TRUSTEES
SeanTreacy
Morris Alter
Nicholas Cicchetti
Michael Hyland
Seane D. Marren
Frank Rey

John Hughes, Jr.
Village Counsel

Angela Everett
Deputy Village Clerk

Frank Anzoviao
Village Treasurer

HISTORIC PAST - GREAT FUTURE

MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF ASSESSMENT REVIEW
March 12, 1991
The Board of Assessment Review reconvened on Tuesday, March 12,
1991 and adopted the recommendation of the Village Assessor
regarding grievances filed against the February 1, 1991 Tentative
Assessment Roll.
Attached is the specifics for each grievance.
Also adopted and attached are the 1991 exemptions for aged and
veterans.

^2^^/^—-

28 Beekman Avenue, North Tarrytown, New York 10591
/P14I 63.1-0113

�COMPLAINANT

TENTATIVE 1991
ASSESSED VALUATION

RECOMMENDED
ACTION

FINAL PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT-1991 ROLL

COUNTRY MANOR
HOMES, INC.
SEC. 15 BL, 12
LOTS 6.1 -6.13

$997,500
(Total)

DENY
LACK OP
INFORMATION

$997,500

BRUFF INC.
HUGH CASEY
49 BEEKMAN AVE.
SEC. 16 BL. 07
LOT 16

$168,700

DENY
LACK OF
INFORMATION

$168,700

T. MARSALA
INVESTORS
15 CHESTNUT ST.
SEC. 16 BL, 7
LOT 2 7

$500,000

DENY
LACK OF
INFORMATION

$500,000

HANNAH LEVY TRUST
18 FRANCIS ST.
15-9-16
16 FRANCIS ST.
15-9-15
38 KENDALL AVE.
15-7-10
21-23 THERESA ST.
15-11-21
40 KENDALL AVE.
15-11-17
34 KENDALL AVE.
15-11-15

$622,400
(Total)

DENY
LACK OF
INFORMATION

$622,400

MOVED: Trustee Cicchetti

SECONDED; Trustee Alter

VOTE;

6-0

�/"2

COMPLAINANT

BROSTOFF BUICK/
CADILLAC
VARIOUS PARCELS
ON NO. BROADWAY
SEC. BL. LT.
17-21-15
17-21-16
17-21-17
17-21-18
17-21-19
17-21-21
17-21-20
17-21-22
17-21-23
17-21-24
17-21-26
17-21-32
17-21-33
17-21-34
15-14-17G
15-14-11
17-19-49
17-20-01
17-19-48
17-19-47
17-19-46
17-19-45

TENTATIVE 1991
ASSESSED VALUE

$1,078,300
(Total)

MOVED; Trustee Cicchetti

WAYNE T. JEFFERS
410 NO. BROADWAY
SEC. 17 BL. 21
LOTS 01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
109
110
111
112

FINAL PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT 1991 ROLL

$1,078,300

DENY
LACK OF
INFORMATION

SECONDED: Trustee Alter

$370,100
(Total)

MOVED: Trustee Cicchetti

RECOMMENDED
ACTION

VOTE:

6-0

$370,100

DENY

SECONDED: Trustee Alter

VOTE:

6-0

�COMPLAINANT

TENTATIVE 1991
ASSESSED VALUE

$202,100

STROGLIO AND
FABLE
22 5 NO. BROADWAY
SEC. 16
BL. 07
LT. 02

MOVED;

Trustee Hvland

VAN TASSEL
TARRYTOWN CO.
SEC. 15 BL. 11
LOTS 18
19
20

MOVED:

SECONDED:

$2,662,400
(Total)

Trustee Hvland

SECONDED:

$867,400
ANCHOR MOTOR FREIGHT
(Total)
WEST MAIN ST.
SEC. 16 BL. 1 LOT 1
16
1
3.B
16
1
3.B1
16
1
4

MOVED:

Trustee Hvland

NEW YORK TELEPHONE
SEC. 95 BL. 06 LT. 04
95
06
06

MOVEDJ

Trustee Hvland

SECONDED:

$499,950
(Total)

SECONDED:

RECOMMENDED
ACTION

FINAL PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT-1991 ROLL

$202,100

DENY
LACK OF
INFORMATION

Trustee Rev

VOTE:

6-0

$2,662,400

DENY
LACK OF
INFORMATION

Trustee Alter

VOTE:

6-0

$867,400

DENY
LACK OF
INFORMATION

Trustee Alter

VOTE:

6-0

$499,950

DENY
LACK OF
INFORMATION

Trustee Rev

VOTE:

6-0

�ro~"

TENTATIVE 1991
ASSESSED VALUE

COMPLAINANT

$548,900

DURACELL
ELM ST.
SEC. 15 BL. 3
LOTS 03
3A

MOVED; T r u s t e e

Hvland

GLENDENNING
3 7 GORY BROOK R D .
S E C . 17 BL. 1
LOT. 2 1

MOVED; T r u s t e e

Treacy

SECONDED;

$77,000

SECONDED;

LI
24 ANDERSON AVE,
SEC. 17 BL. 16
LOTS 01
02

$160,000

MOVED; Trustee Treacy

SECONDED;

RECOMMENDED
ACTION

FINAL PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT-1991 ROLL

DENY; RE-ALLOCATE
$ 5 4 8 , 900
ASSESSMENT TOTALLY
TO THE LAND PORTION

Trustee Alter

VOTE;

6-0

$77,000

DENY

T r u s t e e Marren

VOTE:

6-0

REDUCE ASSESSED
VALUE-$30,000
NOTE; DWELLING
SOLD ON 09-12-90
FOR $265,000

Trustee Marren

VOTE:

6-0

$130,000

�COMPLAINANT

TENTATIVE 1991
ASSESSED VALUE

LINGARDO
2 7 PINE CLOSE
SEC. 17 BL. 10
LOT 17

$139,000

MOVED; Trustee Cicchetti

POSCA
42 NEW BROADWAY
SEC. 17 BL. 11
LOT 04

SECONDED; Trustee Alter

$202,500

MOVED: Trustee Hvland

SECONDED: Trustee Marren

$94,500

VOTE; 6-0

REDUCE ASSESSED
VALUE - $30,000
NOTE; DWELLING SOLD
ON 01-02-91 FOR
$175,000

REA
148 HIGHLAND AVE.
SEC. 14 BL. 21 LT. 43

FUDALI
117 VAN TASSEL AVE.
SEC. 17 BL. 23
LTS. 73
74

FINAL PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT-1991 ROLL

REDUCE ASSESSED
$132,000
VALUE $7,000; ASSESSMENT OF
$132,000 @ RESIDENTIAL
RATIO OF 43.50%
INDICATES FULL
VALUE $303,000

SECONDED; Trustee Hvland

$110,000

MOVED: Trustee Cicchetti

RECOMMENDED
ACTION

VOTE; 6-0

REDUCE ASSESSED
VALUE - $32,500
NOTE: DWELLING
SOLD ON 07-10-89
FOR $375,000

SECONDED: Trustee Marren

FITZGERALD
18 ANDERSON AVE.
SEC. 17 BL. 16
LTS. 05
06

$110,200

MOVED: Trustee Hvland

SECONDED: Trustee Cicchetti

$170,000

VOTE: 6-0

REDUCE ASSESSED
VALUE - $ 7 , 0 0 0

MOVED; Trustee Hvland

$80,000

$87,500

VOTE: 6-0

REDUCE ASSESSED
VALUE - $ 1 5 , 0 0 0

VOTE: 6-0

$95,200

�$£)

COMPLAINANT

TENTATIVE 1991
ASSESSED VALUE

BILOON
150 MERLIN AVE.
SEC. 14 BL. 25 LT. 03

$229,000

MOVED: Trustee Cicchetti

MANN
4 FREMONT RD.
SEC. 11 BL. 01B
LTS. 04/05
06/09
10

MOVED:

Trustee Hvland

$345,000
(Total)

SECONDED:

$95,000

MOVED:

SECONDED:

PHELAN DEVELOPMENT
670 RIVERSIDE DR.
SEC. 11 BL. 1R LT. 1C

MOVED:

Trustee Marren

FINAL PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT-1991 ROLL

$315,000

$170,000

REDUCE ASSESSED
VALUE - $59,000

SECONDED: Trustee Rev

GAYDOS
2 5 BEDFORD RD.
SEC. 17 BL. 11
LT. 05
Trustee Hvland

RECOMMENDED
ACTION

VOTE: 6-0

RE-ALLOCATE AND
$310,300
REDUCE ASSESSED
(Total)
VALUATIONS TO
CONFORM TO LOT AREAS
AND PHYSICAL
LAYOUT OF DWELLING;
NET REDUCTION RECOMMENDED
IS $34,700

Trustee Marren

VOTE: 6-0

$90,000

REDUCE ASSESSED
VALUE $5,000

Trustee Marren

VOTE: 6-0

REDUCE ASSESSED
VALUE BY $95,000;
LISTING SHEET
INDICATES LISTING
PRICE OF $475,000;
NEWLY CONSTRUCTED
DWELLING NOT SOLD AS
OF 01-01-91

SECONDED: T r u s t e e Hvland

VOTE:

6-0

$220,000

�TENTATIVE 1991
ASSESSED VALUE

COMPLAINANT

$97,000

GUARNERI
19 ELM ST.
SEC. 15 BL. 06
LT. 12

MOVED:

T r u s t e e Hvland

GUARNERI
6 0 HOWARD S T .
S E C . 1 5 B L . 0 6 LT.
MOVED:

Trustee

26

MOVED: T r u s t e e

Cicchetti

MOVED: T r u s t e e

Hvland

VOTE:

Alter

VOTE:

$87,000

6-0

$75,000

6-0

REDUCE ASSESSED VALUE
$ 1 5 , 0 0 0 BASED UPON A
REVIEW OF COMPARABLE
SALES

SECONDED: T r u s t e e

$124,700
CAETANO
2 7 LAWRENCE AVE.
S E C . 1 5 BL. 13 L T . 2 3

VOTE:

REDUCE ASSESSED VALUE
$ 1 0 , 0 0 0 BASED ON REVIEW
OF COMPARABLE SALES

SECONDED: T r u s t e e R e v

$105,000
CAETANO
4 3 LAWRENCE AVE.
SEC. 15 BL. 13 L T . 28

FINAL PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT-1991 ROLL

REDUCE ASSESSED VALUE
$10,000 BASED ON REVIEW
OF COMPARABLE SALES

SECONDED; T r u s t e e A l t e r

$85,000

Hvland

RECOMMENDED
ACTION

$90,000

6-0

REDUCE ASSESSED VALUE
$113,000
$ 1 1 , 7 0 0 BASED UPON
A REVIEW OF COMPARABLE SALES

SECONDED: T r u s t e e R e v

VOTE:

6-0

�1991 - VETERAN'S EXEMPTION^- NEW APPLICANTS
SEC

BLK. NO.

14-25

-11

12,000

Klami

12 ,000

Annicchiarico

20,000

- 2 &amp; 2A

Fine

12 ,000

- 11

Goodwyn

20 ,000

- 1J

17

15-

0 5 - 7
11

14- 24

EXEMPTION ALLOWED

Jele nek

14-

14-

NAME OF VETERAN

15-

0 2 - 7

Es teban

20,000

14-

0 8 - 1

Jacobsen

20,000 + 16,500 (D)

Byelick

12,000

Huston

12 ,000

17- 17

-12

11- 01D - 14
Bl7- 01

-18A

Pirc io

20 ,000

il7- 01

-10

Patten

12 ,000

17- 14

-7

S imc oe

12 ,000

14- 04

-1L

Carroll

12,000

17- 18

-27

V izvary

12, 00 0 + 11,7 00 (D)

17- 23' -68

Jano s

12,000 + 4,820

17- 19

-4 1

Hrotlco

20,000

17- 20

-3 4

Shibetti

12,000

11- 01J -6

Leune r

12,000

14- 02

-1Q

R1 g n e y

20,000

16- 06

-28

Pu13 on i

19, 725

MOVED

Trustee Treacy

SECONDED:

Trustee Rey

VOTE:

6-0

(D)

�1991 - L i s t i n g

e c. ,

Blk . ,

&amp; Lot

of

Partial

Name

No.

Tax E x e m p t i o n

" Aged

Exempt.

Percentage

11-01P-1

M.

Manderen

50

14-02-1A

V.

Page

50

14-03-4

A.

Smith

50

14-19-1C

M.

Verrone

50

14-21-2F

C,. Roo s a

50

14-25-8A

C.,

Boggs

50

15-05-20

M.

Donovan

50

15-05-27

V.

Tyra

50

15-08-04

G.

DiFilippo

35

15-09-06

J . Alvado

45

15-10-17

M . Ad a m o v i c

50

15-10-23

R.

DeDiego

50

15-11-12

A.

Santos

50

15-11-28

M . P a s t e 11

50

15-13-24

F.

Kof ka

45

16-03-05

E. Milulasek

50

16-03-10

A,

Deely

50

16-03-14

H . Manca

50

16-08-15/16&amp;18A

L.

50

16-08-34

M . Williams

30

L.

Op i e

50

16-12-01A

M.

Cannillo

50

16-14-13

K.

Meravy

50

17-01-10

W.

P a t ten

50

K.

Weaver

50

17-08-14

F.

Talley

50

17-09-01C

Z.

Abelaf

50

17-10-07

P.

Fiala

35

M , Bodelsen

50

1 7 - 1 3- 04 R

A.

50

17-15-03

M . HOT e c k y

35

17-23-11

H.

N a p o l i t ano

3 5'

16-08-03

A.

Lucas

50

16-10-01

17-01-0213

17-10-11A

MOVED:

&amp;02

&amp; 03A

&amp; 12

Trustee Treacy

Paolantonio

Sulek

SECONDED:

Trustee Cicchetti

VOTE:

6-0

�w

1991 - listing
Sec. , Blk.

&amp; Lot

No.

of P a r t i a l

Name

Exemption

- Aged
Exempt . Percentage

Heagney

50

15-06-04

Ve scey

50

15-12-14

Gu ilfoyle

50

16-03-01A

Boyd

50

16-03-03

Carter

50

17-0 7-18

D e C a r .1. o

50

16-17-10

Gallagher

50

Plick

30

14-21-01

17-08-05

J.

Tax

M.

�^B

STATEMENT AND CANVASS OF RETURN MADE BY
THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF
NORTH TARRYTOWN FOR THE VILLAGE ELECTION
HELD IN SAID VILLAGE FOR THE YEAR 1991.
We, the undersigned members
Village of North Tarrytown,
results of the Annual Village
the 19th. day of March, 1991

of the Board of Trustees of the
New York, DO HEREBY CERTIFY the
Election in and for said Village on
to be as follows:

That the total number of ballots voted was
That the total
of w h i c h :

number

of votes

MICHAEL

cast

1.692

for M a y o r

HYLAND

F R A N K J. R E Y

was

1668

received

743

received

925

That the total number of votes cast for Village Trustees was
4892
. of w h i c h
NICHOLAS

CICCHETTI

MORRIS MACE
DENNIS

ALTER

MCDANIEL

J A M E S J.

TIMMINGS,III

received

769

received

911

received

644

received 1031

JOHN T. HAYES, JR.

received

777

JAMES J. NAZEMETZ

received

760

We hereby declare the following elected
For Mayor

Two Year Term

For Trustee—--Two Year Term

Frank J . Rey
James J . Timmings, I I I
Morris Mace A l t e r
John T. Hayes, J r .

;^^A&gt;g,Y &lt;z^£2&amp;

mnnermrpe

TRUSTEES

v-

�That the whole number of ballots voted for Mayor in the FIRST
ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
144
142
, total number of votes cast
of which:

MICHAEL HYLAND

RECEIVED

FRANK J. REY

RECEIVED

103
39

That the whole number of ballots voted for Trustees in the FIRST
ELECTION DISTRICT
of the Village of North Tarrytown was
144
/ total number of votes cast
420
of which:

NICHOLAS CICCHETTI
MORRIS MACE ALTER
DENNIS MCDANIEL

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

97
96
86

JAMES J. TIMMINGS, III
JOHN T. HAYES, JR.
JAMES J. NAZEMETZ

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

57
43
41

That the whole number of ballots voted for Mayor in the SECOND
ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
210
of which:
total number of votes cast

MICHAEL HYLAND

RECEIVED

FRANK J. REY

RECEIVED

131
76

That the whole number of ballots voted for Trustees in the SECOND
ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
210
, total number of votes cast
584
of which:

116

NICHOLAS CICCHETTI
MORRIS MACE ALTER
DENNIS MCDANIEL

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

130

JAMES J. TIMMINGS, III
JOHN T. HAYES, JR.
JAMES J. NAZEMETZ

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

87
66
61

124

�3^6~

That the whole number of ballots voted for Mayor in the THIRD
ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
101
, total number of votes cast
101
of which:
MICHAEL HYLAND

RECEIVED

FRANK J. REY

RECEIVED

54
47

That the whole number of ballots voted for Trustees in the THIRD
ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
101
, total number of votes cast
286
of which:
NICHOLAS CICCHETTI
42
RECEIVED
MORRIS MACE ALTER
53
RECEIVED
DENNIS MCDANIEL
RECEIVED
40
JAMES J. TIMMINGS, III
JOHN T. HAYES, JR.
JAMES J. NAZEMETZ

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

64
46
41

That the whole number of ballots voted for Mayor in the FOURTH
ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
97
, total number of votes cast
96
D f which:
MICHAEL HYLAND

RECEIVED

43

FRANK J. REY

RECEIVED

53

That the whole numbe of ballots voted for Trustees in the FOURTH
ELECTION DISTRICT
of the Village of North Tarrytown was
97
, total number of votes cast
279
of which:
NICHOLAS CICCHETTI
MORRIS MACE ALTER
DENNIS MCDANIEL

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

42
48
38

JAMES J. TIMMINGS, III
JOHN T. HAYES, JR.
JAMES J. NAZEMETZ

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

64
49
38

�^vlb

That the whole number of ballots voted for Mayor in the FIFTH
ELECTION DISTRICT
of the Village of North Tarrytown was
199
199
. total number of votes cast
of which:
MICHAEL HYLAND

RECEIVED

FRANK J. REY

RECEIVED

92
107

That the whole number of ballots voted for Trustees in the FIFTH
ELECTION DISTRICT
of the Village of North Tarrytown was
!99
total number of votes cast
576
of which:
NICHOLAS CICCHETTI
MORRIS MACE ALTER
DENNIS MCDANIEL
JAMES J. TIMMINGS, III
JOHN T. HAYES, JR.
JAMES J. NAZEMETZ

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

87
98
79

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

117
106
89

That the whole number of ballots voted for Mayor in the SIXTH
ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
20
210
total number of votes cast
*
of which:
MICHAEL HYLAND

RECEIVED

60

FRANK J. REY

RECEIVED

144

That the whole number of ballots voted for Trustees in the SIXTH
ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
2iQ
, total number of votes cast
612
of which:
NICHOLAS CICCHETTI
MORRIS MACE ALTER
DENNIS MCDANIEL

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

93
127
66

JAMES J. TIMMINGS, III
JOHN T. HAYES, JR.
JAMES J. NAZEMETZ

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

135
87
104

�That the whole number of ballots voted for Mayor in the SEVENTH
ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
2
302
,total number of votes cast
j_^
°f which:
MICHAEL HYLAND

RECEIVED

92

FRANK J. REY

RECEIVED

201

That the whole number of ballots voted for Trustees in the
SEVENTH ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
302
888
of which:
ttotal number of votes cast
102

NICHOLAS CICCHETTI
MORRIS MACE ALTER
DENNIS MCDANIEL

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

135

JAMES J. TIMMINGS, III
JOHN T. HAYES, JR.
JAMES J. NAZEMETZ

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

221
179
174

77

That the whole number of ballots voted for Mayor in the EIGHTH
ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
148
146
°-r which:
t total number of votes cast
MICHAEL HYLAND
RECEIVED_
49
FRANK J. REY

RECEIVED

97

That the whole number of ballots voted for
Trustees
in the
EIGHTH ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
*48
, total number of votes cast
439
of which:
NICHOLAS CICCHETTI
MORRIS MACE ALTER
DENNIS MCDANIEL

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

50
66
43

JAMES J. TIMMINGS, III
JOHN T. HAYES, JR.
JAMES J. NAZEMETZ

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

111
79
90

�wr
That the whole number of ballots voted for Mayor in the NINTH
ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
164
165
, total number of votes cast
of which:
MICHAEL HYLAND

RECEIVED

SLL

FRANK J. REY

RECEIVED

68

That the whole number of ballots voted for Trustees in the NINTH
ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
165
, total number of votes cast
470
of which:
NICHOLAS CICCHETTI
RECEIVED
85
MORRIS MACE ALTER
RECEIVED
103
DENNIS MCDANIEL
RECEIVED
68
JAMES J. TIMMINGS, III
JOHN T. HAYES,JR.
JAMES J. NAZEMETZ

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

86
63
65

That the whole number of ballots voted for Mayor in the TENTH
ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
116
116
, total number of votes cast
of which:
MICHAEL HYLAND
RECEIVED
23
93
FRANK J. REY
RECEIVED

That the whole number of ballots voted for Trustees in the TENTH
ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
116
,total number of votes cast
338
_of which:
NICHOLAS CICCHETTI
RECEIVED
55
MORRIS MACE ALTER
RECEIVED
55
DENNIS MCDANIEL
RECEIVED
23
JAMES J. TIMMINGS, III
JOHN T. HAYES, JR.
JAMES J. NAZEMETZ

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

!•

89
59
57

�wr
That the whole number of ballots voted for Mayor in the NINTH
ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
16
165
, total number of votes cast
*
of which:
MICHAEL HYLAND

RECEIVED

-2&amp;.

FRANK J. REY

RECEIVED

68

That the whole number of ballots voted for Trustees in the NINTH
ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
165
, total number of votes cast
470
of which:
NICHOLAS CICCHETTI
RECEIVED
85
MORRIS MACE ALTER
RECEIVED
103
DENNIS MCDANIEL
RECEIVED
68
JAMES J. TIMMINGS, III
JOHN T. HAYES,JR.
JAMES J. NAZEMETZ

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

86
63
65

That the whole number of ballots voted for Mayor in the TENTH
ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
116
116
, total number of votes cast
of which:
MICHAEL HYLAND
RECEIVED
23
FRANK J. REY

93

RECEIVED

That the whole number of ballots voted for Trustees in the TENTH
ELECTION DISTRICT of the Village of North Tarrytown was
116
__,total number of votes cast
338
of which:
NICHOLAS CICCHETTI
RECEIVED
55
MORRIS MACE ALTER
RECEIVED
55
DENNIS MCDANIEL
RECEIVED
23
JAMES J. TIMMINGS, III
JOHN T. HAYES, JR.
JAMES J. NAZEMETZ

RECEIVED
RECEIVED
RECEIVED

89
59
57

�!

MAYOR
FIRST ELECTION DISTRICT

142

SECOND ELECTION DISTRICT

207

THIRD ELECTION DISTRICT

101

FOURTH ELECTION DISTRICT

96

FIFTH ELECTION DISTRICT

199

SIXTH ELECTION DISTRICT

204

SEVENTH ELECTION DISTRICT
EIGHTH ELECTION DISTRICT
NINTH ELECTION DISTRICT
TENTH ELECTION DISTRICT

TOTAL

WRITE

INS

�On Thursday, March 14, 19 91 at 10:00 AM a Public Opening of bids
took place in the Municipal Building at 2 8 Beekman Avenue, North
Tarrytown, New York 10591 for furnishing, delivering and
unloading of approximately 100,000 lbs. per year of bulk liquid
sodium silicate for water treatment use until May 31, 1992.
Present:

William T. Regan, Village Administrator/Village Clerk

The following bids were received and opened:
1.

Jones Chemicals,Inc.
PO Box 2 80
River Road
Warwick, NY 10990
Amount of bid:

$ 9,250.

2. George S. Coyne Chemical Co., Inc
3 015 State Road
Croydon, Pennsylvania 19020
Amount of bid:

$ 9,4 00

Respectfully submitted,

Angela Everett
Deputy Village Clerk

�</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </file>
  </fileContainer>
  <collection collectionId="70">
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="12271">
                <text>Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes &amp; Resolutions-1991</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </collection>
  <itemType itemTypeId="1">
    <name>Text</name>
    <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
  </itemType>
  <elementSetContainer>
    <elementSet elementSetId="1">
      <name>Dublin Core</name>
      <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
      <elementContainer>
        <element elementId="50">
          <name>Title</name>
          <description>A name given to the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="3883">
              <text>MINS_TRUST_1991-03-05</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="49">
          <name>Subject</name>
          <description>The topic of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="3884">
              <text>Board of Trustees Minutes-1991</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="40">
          <name>Date</name>
          <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="3885">
              <text>1991</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="47">
          <name>Rights</name>
          <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="3886">
              <text>Village of Sleepy Hollow All Rights Reserved.</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
        <element elementId="51">
          <name>Type</name>
          <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
          <elementTextContainer>
            <elementText elementTextId="3887">
              <text>Text</text>
            </elementText>
          </elementTextContainer>
        </element>
      </elementContainer>
    </elementSet>
  </elementSetContainer>
</item>
